All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Benoît Canet" <benoit.canet@irqsave.net>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Benoît Canet" <benoit.canet@irqsave.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] linux-aio: fix submit aio as a batch
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 16:53:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140909145356.GA355@irqsave.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409848030-16568-2-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com>

The Friday 05 Sep 2014 à 00:27:07 (+0800), Ming Lei wrote :
> In the enqueue path, we can't complete request, otherwise
> "Co-routine re-entered recursively" may be caused, so this
> patch fixes the issue with the following ideas:
> 
> 	- for -EAGAIN or partial completion, retry the submission by
> 	scheduling a BH in following completion cb
> 	- for part of completion, also update the io queue
> 	- for other failure, return the failure if in enqueue path,
> 	otherwise, abort all queued I/O
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
> ---
>  block/linux-aio.c |  106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/linux-aio.c b/block/linux-aio.c
> index 9aca758..a06576d 100644
> --- a/block/linux-aio.c
> +++ b/block/linux-aio.c
> @@ -38,11 +38,19 @@ struct qemu_laiocb {
>      QLIST_ENTRY(qemu_laiocb) node;
>  };
>  
> -typedef struct {
> +/*
> + * TODO: support to batch I/O from multiple bs in one same
> + * AIO context, one important use case is multi-lun scsi,
> + * so in future the IO queue should be per AIO context.
> + */
> +typedef struct LaioQueue {
>      struct iocb *iocbs[MAX_QUEUED_IO];
>      int plugged;
> -    unsigned int size;
> -    unsigned int idx;
> +    uint32 size;
> +    uint32 idx;

Sorry Ming I said crap about struct, size and idx.
I initially misread that you where adding this.
You where right from the start.

> +
> +    /* handle -EAGAIN and partial completion */
> +    QEMUBH *retry;
>  } LaioQueue;
>  
>  struct qemu_laio_state {
> @@ -138,6 +146,13 @@ static void qemu_laio_completion_bh(void *opaque)
>      }
>  }
>  
> +static void qemu_laio_start_retry(struct qemu_laio_state *s)
> +{
> +    if (s->io_q.idx) {
> +        qemu_bh_schedule(s->io_q.retry);
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  static void qemu_laio_completion_cb(EventNotifier *e)
>  {
>      struct qemu_laio_state *s = container_of(e, struct qemu_laio_state, e);
> @@ -145,6 +160,7 @@ static void qemu_laio_completion_cb(EventNotifier *e)
>      if (event_notifier_test_and_clear(&s->e)) {
>          qemu_bh_schedule(s->completion_bh);
>      }
> +    qemu_laio_start_retry(s);
>  }
>  
>  static void laio_cancel(BlockDriverAIOCB *blockacb)
> @@ -164,6 +180,7 @@ static void laio_cancel(BlockDriverAIOCB *blockacb)
>      ret = io_cancel(laiocb->ctx->ctx, &laiocb->iocb, &event);
>      if (ret == 0) {
>          laiocb->ret = -ECANCELED;
> +        qemu_laio_start_retry(laiocb->ctx);
>          return;
>      }
>  
> @@ -191,45 +208,80 @@ static void ioq_init(LaioQueue *io_q)
>      io_q->plugged = 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int ioq_submit(struct qemu_laio_state *s)
> +static void abort_queue(struct qemu_laio_state *s)
> +{
> +    int i;
> +    for (i = 0; i < s->io_q.idx; i++) {
> +        struct qemu_laiocb *laiocb = container_of(s->io_q.iocbs[i],
> +                                                  struct qemu_laiocb,
> +                                                  iocb);
> +        laiocb->ret = -EIO;
> +        qemu_laio_process_completion(s, laiocb);
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +static int ioq_submit(struct qemu_laio_state *s, bool enqueue)
>  {
>      int ret, i = 0;
>      int len = s->io_q.idx;
> +    int j = 0;
>  
> -    do {
> -        ret = io_submit(s->ctx, len, s->io_q.iocbs);
> -    } while (i++ < 3 && ret == -EAGAIN);
> +    if (!len) {
> +        return 0;
> +    }
>  
> -    /* empty io queue */
> -    s->io_q.idx = 0;
> +    ret = io_submit(s->ctx, len, s->io_q.iocbs);
> +    if (ret == -EAGAIN) { /* retry in following completion cb */
> +        return 0;
> +    } else if (ret < 0) {
> +        if (enqueue) {
> +            return ret;
> +        }
>  
> -    if (ret < 0) {
> -        i = 0;
> -    } else {
> -        i = ret;
> +        /* in non-queue path, all IOs have to be completed */
> +        abort_queue(s);
> +        ret = len;
> +    } else if (ret == 0) {
> +        goto out;
>      }
>  
> -    for (; i < len; i++) {
> -        struct qemu_laiocb *laiocb =
> -            container_of(s->io_q.iocbs[i], struct qemu_laiocb, iocb);
> -
> -        laiocb->ret = (ret < 0) ? ret : -EIO;
> -        qemu_laio_process_completion(s, laiocb);
> +    for (i = ret; i < len; i++) {
> +        s->io_q.iocbs[j++] = s->io_q.iocbs[i];
>      }
> +
> + out:
> +    /*
> +     * update io queue, for partial completion, retry will be
> +     * started automatically in following completion cb.
> +     */
> +    s->io_q.idx -= ret;
> +
>      return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static void ioq_enqueue(struct qemu_laio_state *s, struct iocb *iocb)
> +static void ioq_submit_retry(void *opaque)
> +{
> +    struct qemu_laio_state *s = opaque;
> +    ioq_submit(s, false);
> +}
> +
> +static int ioq_enqueue(struct qemu_laio_state *s, struct iocb *iocb)
>  {
>      unsigned int idx = s->io_q.idx;
>  
> +    if (unlikely(idx == s->io_q.size)) {
> +        return -1;
> +    }
> +
>      s->io_q.iocbs[idx++] = iocb;
>      s->io_q.idx = idx;
>  
> -    /* submit immediately if queue is full */
> -    if (idx == s->io_q.size) {
> -        ioq_submit(s);
> +    /* submit immediately if queue depth is above 2/3 */
> +    if (idx > s->io_q.size * 2 / 3) {
> +        return ioq_submit(s, true);
>      }
> +
> +    return 0;
>  }
>  
>  void laio_io_plug(BlockDriverState *bs, void *aio_ctx)
> @@ -251,7 +303,7 @@ int laio_io_unplug(BlockDriverState *bs, void *aio_ctx, bool unplug)
>      }
>  
>      if (s->io_q.idx > 0) {
> -        ret = ioq_submit(s);
> +        ret = ioq_submit(s, false);
>      }
>  
>      return ret;
> @@ -295,7 +347,9 @@ BlockDriverAIOCB *laio_submit(BlockDriverState *bs, void *aio_ctx, int fd,
>              goto out_free_aiocb;
>          }
>      } else {
> -        ioq_enqueue(s, iocbs);
> +        if (ioq_enqueue(s, iocbs) < 0) {
> +            goto out_free_aiocb;
> +        }
>      }
>      return &laiocb->common;
>  
> @@ -310,12 +364,14 @@ void laio_detach_aio_context(void *s_, AioContext *old_context)
>  
>      aio_set_event_notifier(old_context, &s->e, NULL);
>      qemu_bh_delete(s->completion_bh);
> +    qemu_bh_delete(s->io_q.retry);
>  }
>  
>  void laio_attach_aio_context(void *s_, AioContext *new_context)
>  {
>      struct qemu_laio_state *s = s_;
>  
> +    s->io_q.retry = aio_bh_new(new_context, ioq_submit_retry, s);
>      s->completion_bh = aio_bh_new(new_context, qemu_laio_completion_bh, s);
>      aio_set_event_notifier(new_context, &s->e, qemu_laio_completion_cb);
>  }
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-09 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-04 16:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] linux-aio: fix batch submission Ming Lei
2014-09-04 16:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] linux-aio: fix submit aio as a batch Ming Lei
2014-09-09 14:53   ` Benoît Canet [this message]
2014-09-04 16:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] linux-aio: handling -EAGAIN for !s->io_q.plugged case Ming Lei
2014-09-04 16:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] linux-aio: remove 'node' from 'struct qemu_laiocb' Ming Lei
2014-09-04 16:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] linux-aio: increase max event to 256 Ming Lei
2014-09-09 14:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] linux-aio: fix batch submission Ming Lei
2014-10-15 15:04 ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140909145356.GA355@irqsave.net \
    --to=benoit.canet@irqsave.net \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.