From: Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com>
To: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: amit.shah@redhat.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RFC virtio-rng: fail to read sysfs of a busy device
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 23:23:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140909152307.GB17178@zen.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140909151844.GA17178@zen.redhat.com>
(Resend to fix the subject)
Hi Amit, Rusty
RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127062
steps:
- Read random data by 'dd if=/dev/hwrng of=/dev/null' in guest
- check sysfs files in the same time, 'cat /sys/class/misc/hw_random/rng_*'
Result: cat process will get stuck, it will return if we kill dd process.
We have some static variables (eg, current_rng, data_avail, etc) in hw_random/core.c,
they are protected by rng_mutex. I try to workaround this issue by undelay(100)
after mutex_unlock() in rng_dev_read(). This gives chance for hwrng_attr_*_show()
to get mutex.
This patch also contains some cleanup, moving some code out of mutex
protection.
Do you have some suggestion? Thanks.
diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
index aa30a25..fa69020 100644
--- a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
+++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
@@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static ssize_t rng_dev_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf,
}
mutex_unlock(&rng_mutex);
+ udelay(100);
if (need_resched())
schedule_timeout_interruptible(1);
@@ -233,10 +234,10 @@ static ssize_t hwrng_attr_current_store(struct device *dev,
int err;
struct hwrng *rng;
+ err = -ENODEV;
err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rng_mutex);
if (err)
return -ERESTARTSYS;
- err = -ENODEV;
list_for_each_entry(rng, &rng_list, list) {
if (strcmp(rng->name, buf) == 0) {
if (rng == current_rng) {
@@ -270,8 +271,8 @@ static ssize_t hwrng_attr_current_show(struct device *dev,
return -ERESTARTSYS;
if (current_rng)
name = current_rng->name;
- ret = snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n", name);
mutex_unlock(&rng_mutex);
+ ret = snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n", name);
return ret;
}
@@ -284,19 +285,19 @@ static ssize_t hwrng_attr_available_show(struct device *dev,
ssize_t ret = 0;
struct hwrng *rng;
+ buf[0] = '\0';
err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rng_mutex);
if (err)
return -ERESTARTSYS;
- buf[0] = '\0';
list_for_each_entry(rng, &rng_list, list) {
strncat(buf, rng->name, PAGE_SIZE - ret - 1);
ret += strlen(rng->name);
strncat(buf, " ", PAGE_SIZE - ret - 1);
ret++;
}
+ mutex_unlock(&rng_mutex);
strncat(buf, "\n", PAGE_SIZE - ret - 1);
ret++;
- mutex_unlock(&rng_mutex);
return ret;
}
--
Amos.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-09 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-09 15:18 mutex Amos Kong
2014-09-09 15:23 ` Amos Kong [this message]
2014-09-10 5:52 ` RFC virtio-rng: fail to read sysfs of a busy device Amit Shah
2014-09-10 6:49 ` Amos Kong
2014-09-10 7:32 ` Amos Kong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140909152307.GB17178@zen.redhat.com \
--to=akong@redhat.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.