From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751919AbaIJODe (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:03:34 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:38808 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750925AbaIJODd (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:03:33 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,499,1406617200"; d="scan'208";a="476612687" Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 07:02:58 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, eranian@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf, x86: Use INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT for PRECDIST Message-ID: <20140910140258.GI5387@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <1410310148-26260-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <1410310148-26260-2-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <20140910075926.GM6758@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140910075926.GM6758@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:59:26AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 05:49:08PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > From: Andi Kleen > > > > The earlier commit 86a04461a made near all PEBS on > > Sandy/IvyBridge/Haswell to reject non zero flags. > > What's magic about nehalem and westmere? I wasn't able to confirm their behavior explicitly, so I felt it best to leave them alone. But in principle adding the _FLAGS changes there too would make sense too. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only