From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Blogpost: Explaining why I do PPS measurement with 64 bytes
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:18:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140911111807.754b7336@redhat.com> (raw)
People generally seem to have a hardtime understanding why I'm using
64byte packets and measuring PPS, when tuning the network stack.
People keep telling me this is artificial benchmarking, which is true,
but there is another reason behind these measurements.
Which I have described in this blogpost:
http://netoptimizer.blogspot.dk/2014/09/packet-per-sec-measurements-for.html
I'm basically leveraging the PPS measurements to deduct the nanosec
improvements I'm making to the code.
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
reply other threads:[~2014-09-11 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140911111807.754b7336@redhat.com \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.