From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>
Cc: "cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com" <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
"Alex.Williamson@redhat.com" <Alex.Williamson@redhat.com>,
"agraf@suse.de" <agraf@suse.de>,
"gleb@kernel.org" <gleb@kernel.org>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>,
"christoffer.dall@linaro.org" <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Make kvm_device_ops registration dynamic
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:12:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140911171213.GC6158@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409650056-27065-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>
Hi Paolo,
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:27:32AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is version 3 of the patches originally posted here:
>
> v1: http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm-arm/msg10219.html
> v2: http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg105197.html
>
> Changes since v2 include:
>
> - Rebased onto 3.17-rc* (the vgic code changed a lot!)
> - Added relevant acks
>
> The mpic, flic and xics are still not ported over, as I don't want to
> risk breaking those devices (it's not clear at which point they need to
> be registered).
Any further comments on this lot?
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-11 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-02 9:27 [PATCH v3 0/4] Make kvm_device_ops registration dynamic Will Deacon
2014-09-02 9:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] KVM: device: add simple registration mechanism for kvm_device_ops Will Deacon
2014-09-02 9:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: ARM: vgic: register kvm_device_ops dynamically Will Deacon
2014-09-02 9:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] KVM: s390: register flic ops dynamically Will Deacon
2014-09-02 9:27 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] KVM: VFIO: register kvm_device_ops dynamically Will Deacon
2014-09-11 17:12 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2014-09-16 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Make kvm_device_ops registration dynamic Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140911171213.GC6158@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=Alex.Williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=Marc.Zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.