Re: [PATCH 0/3] Implement /proc/built-in file similar to /proc/modules

[Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>]

On 09/14, Greg KH wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 02:18:13PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> > This series implements a possibility to show the list of built-in drivers
> > to userspace. The names of drivers will be the same as when they are modules.
>
> Have you looked at /sys/modules/ ?  Doesn't that show what you want
> here?

Well, /sys/module/ doesn't list the modules (drivers) compiled in. Say,
/sys/module/kernel. And it can't help a user to figure out that, say, the
loop driver is already "loaded" because CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=y.

> Module names aren't "standardized", we change them at times when needed,
> just like CONFIG_ names.

OK, but still the name will be the same, in /proc/modules or /proc/builtin.

> What is your end goal here?  As you say, config.gz is the real kernel
> configuration, just having a list of modules built in isn't going to
> help much in getting a working kernel config without it.

Perhaps you are right... but otoh perhaps this can can be useful anyway.
Again, a user can know about "insmod loop", but he can know nothing
about CONFIG_ names.

That said, I do not really understand 2/3. Not only I do not understand
this kbuild magic, I am not sure I understand what /proc/built-in will
actually show.

To me it would be better to change the "ifndef MODULE" version of
module_init() to add KBUILD_MODNAME into __builtin_drivers_list[].

Yes, module_init() is overused. Say, why does kernel/kprobes.c use
module_init() ? This looks confusing, this code can't be compiled as a
module. And it seems that it has a lot more users which should have used
__initcall() instead.

In short, I dunno ;)

Oleg.