From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] arch: do not distinguish revisions of ARM1136JF-S
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:33:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140915213339.GC3878@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1410814919-11523-4-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
On 2014-09-15 23:01 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
> In commit 88cf3bb91792c9c04586e14f293d89a6e0c13e1d
> ("arch/Config.in.arm: Use armv6k for arm1136jf-s rev1"), Beno?t
> Th?baudeau added separate options for the revision 0 and revision 1 of
> the ARM1136JF-S processor, so that different -march values could be
> used (armv6j for revision 0, armv6k for revision 1).
>
> However, this is preventing the removal of the BR2_GCC_TARGET_ARCH
> option, which we need to do to give only the CPU type to gcc, and let
> it decide the architecture variant that matches. This is because this
> story of revision 0 vs. revision 1 is the only case where -mcpu
> doesn't fully define the CPU.
>
> Moreover, a quick test with gcc shows that -march=armv6j
> -mcpu=arm1136jf-s is accepted, while -march=armv6k -mcpu=arm1136jf-s
> makes gcc complain: " warning: switch -mcpu=arm1136jf-s conflicts with
> -march=armv6k switch".
>
> In addition, gcc 5 will apparently no longer allow to pass all of
> --with-arch, --with-cpu and --with-tune, so we will anyway have to
> rely only on one of them.
>
> As a consequence, this commit basically reverts
> 88cf3bb91792c9c04586e14f293d89a6e0c13e1d and provides only one option
> for ARM1136JF-S. If the two revisions are really different, then they
> should be supported in upstream gcc with different -mcpu values.
>
> Note that the removal of the two options should not break existing
> full .config, since the hidden option BR2_arm1136jf_s becomes again a
> visible option to select the CPU.
But it would break a defconfig.
As suggested on IRC, move the BR2_arm1136jf_s_r1 to Config.legacy, and
have it select BR2_arm1136jf_s, so the user can re-use a defconfig.
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> Cc: Beno?t Th?baudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
> ---
> arch/Config.in.arm | 15 +++------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/Config.in.arm b/arch/Config.in.arm
> index 201ff1d..6e3c4e6 100644
> --- a/arch/Config.in.arm
> +++ b/arch/Config.in.arm
> @@ -54,12 +54,8 @@ config BR2_arm926t
> bool "arm926t"
> select BR2_ARM_CPU_MAYBE_HAS_VFPV2
> select BR2_ARM_CPU_HAS_THUMB
> -config BR2_arm1136jf_s_r0
> - bool "arm1136jf_s rev0"
> - select BR2_ARM_CPU_HAS_VFPV2
> - select BR2_ARM_CPU_HAS_THUMB
> -config BR2_arm1136jf_s_r1
> - bool "arm1136jf_s rev1"
> +config BR2_arm1136jf_s
> + bool "arm1136jf-s"
> select BR2_ARM_CPU_HAS_VFPV2
> select BR2_ARM_CPU_HAS_THUMB
> config BR2_arm1176jz_s
> @@ -113,10 +109,6 @@ config BR2_iwmmxt
> bool "iwmmxt"
> endchoice
>
> -config BR2_arm1136jf_s
> - bool
> - default BR2_arm1136jf_s_r0 || BR2_arm1136jf_s_r1
> -
> choice
> prompt "Target ABI"
> depends on BR2_arm || BR2_armeb
> @@ -364,8 +356,7 @@ config BR2_GCC_TARGET_ARCH
> default "armv4t" if BR2_arm920t
> default "armv4t" if BR2_arm922t
> default "armv5te" if BR2_arm926t
> - default "armv6j" if BR2_arm1136jf_s_r0
> - default "armv6k" if BR2_arm1136jf_s_r1
> + default "armv6j" if BR2_arm1136jf_s
> default "armv6zk" if BR2_arm1176jz_s
> default "armv6zk" if BR2_arm1176jzf_s
> default "armv7-a" if BR2_cortex_a5
> --
> 2.0.0
>
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-15 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-15 21:01 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4] Fix march/mcpu conflict on ARM Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-15 21:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] arch: remove BR2_arm920 reference Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-15 21:08 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-09-18 20:12 ` Peter Korsgaard
2014-09-15 21:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] arch: remove BR2_arm10t Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-15 21:13 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-09-15 21:16 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-18 20:12 ` Peter Korsgaard
2014-09-15 21:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] arch: do not distinguish revisions of ARM1136JF-S Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-15 21:16 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2014-09-15 21:33 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2014-09-15 21:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-15 21:44 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2014-09-15 21:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-15 22:36 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2014-09-15 22:02 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-09-15 22:37 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2014-09-15 21:48 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-09-15 21:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] arch: remove BR2_GCC_TARGET_ARCH definitions on ARM Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-15 22:09 ` Yann E. MORIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140915213339.GC3878@free.fr \
--to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.