All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] migration: qemu-coroutine-lock.c:141: qemu_co_mutex_unlock: Assertion `mutex->locked == 1' failed
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:52:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140916125223.GC4886@noname.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54182EAE.4000802@redhat.com>

Am 16.09.2014 um 14:35 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> Il 16/09/2014 14:34, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
> > I think bdrv_invalidate_cache() really needs to call bdrv_drain_all()
> > before starting to reopen stuff. There could be requests in flight
> > without holding the lock and if you can indeed reopen their BDS under
> > their feet without breaking things (I doubt it), that would be pure
> > luck.
> 
> But even that's not enough without a lock if .bdrv_invalidate_cache (the
> callback) is called from a coroutine.  As soon as it yields, another
> request can come in, for example from the NBD server.

Yes, that's true. We can't fix this problem in qcow2, though, because
it's a more general one.  I think we must make sure that
bdrv_invalidate_cache() doesn't yield.

Either by forbidding to run bdrv_invalidate_cache() in a coroutine and
moving the problem to the caller (where and why is it even called from a
coroutine?), or possibly by creating a new coroutine for the driver
callback and running that in a nested event loop that only handles
bdrv_invalidate_cache() callbacks, so that the NBD server doesn't get a
chance to process new requests in this thread.

Forbidding to run in a coroutine sounds easier, but I don't see yet
which caller would have to be fixed.

Kevin

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-16 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-15 10:50 [Qemu-devel] migration: qemu-coroutine-lock.c:141: qemu_co_mutex_unlock: Assertion `mutex->locked == 1' failed Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-16 12:02 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-16 12:10   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-16 12:34     ` Kevin Wolf
2014-09-16 12:35       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-16 12:52         ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2014-09-16 12:59           ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-19  8:47             ` Kevin Wolf
2014-09-23  8:47               ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] qcow2: Fix race in cache invalidation Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-24  7:30                 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-24  9:48                 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-09-25  8:41                   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-25  8:57                     ` Kevin Wolf
2014-09-25  9:55                       ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-25 10:20                         ` Kevin Wolf
2014-09-25 12:29                           ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-25 12:39                             ` Kevin Wolf
2014-09-25 14:05                               ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-28 11:14                                 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-17  6:46       ` [Qemu-devel] migration: qemu-coroutine-lock.c:141: qemu_co_mutex_unlock: Assertion `mutex->locked == 1' failed Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-16 14:52     ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-17  9:06     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-09-17  9:25       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-17 13:44         ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-17 15:07           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-09-18  3:26             ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-18  9:56               ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-19  8:23                 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-17 15:04         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-09-17 15:17           ` Eric Blake
2014-09-17 15:53           ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140916125223.GC4886@noname.str.redhat.com \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.