All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@canoical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] blk-mq: remove unnecessary blk_clear_rq_complete()
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:48:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140917164850.GB18472@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1410947278-15733-3-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com>

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 05:47:58PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canoical.com>
> 
> This patch removes two unnecessary blk_clear_rq_complete(),
> the REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE flag is cleared inside blk_mq_start_request(),
> so:
> 
> 	- The blk_clear_rq_complete() in blk_flush_restore_request()
> 	needn't because the request will be freed later, and clearing
> 	it here may open a small race window with timeout.

This one is defintively correct, blk_mq_end_io should take care of this.

> 	- The blk_clear_rq_complete() in blk_mq_requeue_request() isn't
> 	necessary too, even though REQ_ATOM_STARTED is cleared in
> 	__blk_mq_requeue_request(), in theory it still may cause a small
> 	race window with timeout since the two clear_bit() may be
> 	reordered.

Why yo you think it's not nessecary?  The request is not in the drivers
hand at this point, so it should not be marked started.  Maybe I'm missing
something, but this sounds like it could very likely cause regressions.


  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-17 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-17  9:47 [PATCH 0/2] blk-mq: fix race between timeout and queue_rq Ming Lei
2014-09-17  9:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Ming Lei
2014-09-17 16:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-17  9:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] blk-mq: remove unnecessary blk_clear_rq_complete() Ming Lei
2014-09-17 16:48   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2014-09-18  1:33     ` Ming Lei
2014-09-18 16:26       ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140917164850.GB18472@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@canoical.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.