From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PING] various patches
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:20:33 -0400
Message-ID: <20140917182033.GA9347@laptop.dumpdata.com>
References: <541998780200007800035AB3@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<1410973600.23505.52.camel@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>) id 1XUJqQ-0000kc-DU
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:20:46 +0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1410973600.23505.52.camel@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 06:06:40PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 13:19 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > "REST"-maintainers,
> > 
> > is there any chance I could gets acks or otherwise on
> > 
> > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-09/msg01751.html
> 
> This looks like x86 rather than rest? In any case it seems like Andrew
> is looking into it, and if he is happy with it I think that should be
> sufficient for you to go ahead.

Except he is out for the next six days.
> 
> > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-09/msg02105.html
> 
> I don't see anything wrong with this, but I'm not sure if the reasons
> for Keir's original concerns have now gone away or the circumstances
> have changed etc.

Ditto, it looked OK to me but I needed to refresh on the possible
disadvantages of the r/w locks as compared to bytelocks.
> 
> > Also, does anyone have comments on the approach taken in
> > 
> > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-09/msg02103.html
> > 
> > (see namely the not to be committed part of the description)?
> 
> The bit about migration to an older hypervisor not working? I think you
> are right that we don't care to support that.
> 
> Ian.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel