From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net>
Cc: Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@rock-chips.com>,
heiko@sntech.de, rui.zhang@intel.com, edubezval@gmail.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, huangtao@rock-chips.com,
cf@rock-chips.com, dianders@chromium.org, addy.ke@rock-chips.com,
zyf@rock-chips.com, cjf@rock-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: document Rockchip thermal
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:18:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140918171809.GD14809@core.coreip.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAObsKCYGEBNEvDTs=iQD9KT0YomQWHg0W-vwHG4nLZbqogF=g@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 04:19:26PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On 18 September 2014 15:25, Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> > Tomeu,
> >
> > 在 2014年09月18日 17:27, Tomeu Vizoso 写道:
> >>
> >> On 17 September 2014 05:59, Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@rock-chips.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This add the necessary binding documentation for the thermal
> >>> found on Rockchip SoCs
> >>
> >> Hi Caesar,
> >>
> >> is there any reason to not use the existing thermal bindings? You can
> >> find a description in
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt and example code
> >> in omap, or in the patches for Tegra recently posted by Mikko
> >> Perttunen.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Tomeu
> >
> >
> > Why should I use the existing thermal bindings?
>
> Because otherwise, you are asking to merge duplicated code. There's a
> generic way to define thermal zones, trip points, cooling devices,
> etc. And also code to parse and plug them together. Why add
> soc-specific code to do the same?
>
> > I believe omap,tegar and rockchip are the three seperate thermals driver.
>
> Yes, and OMAP is already using the generic bindings, and the proposed
> patches for Tegra as well, and I think it would make sense for
> Rockchip to also use them (unless I'm missing something).
You are talking about drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c, right? Yes, I think
Rockchip should be using the same generic framework if possible.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com (Dmitry Torokhov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: document Rockchip thermal
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:18:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140918171809.GD14809@core.coreip.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAObsKCYGEBNEvDTs=iQD9KT0YomQWHg0W-vwHG4nLZbqogF=g@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 04:19:26PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On 18 September 2014 15:25, Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> > Tomeu,
> >
> > ? 2014?09?18? 17:27, Tomeu Vizoso ??:
> >>
> >> On 17 September 2014 05:59, Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@rock-chips.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This add the necessary binding documentation for the thermal
> >>> found on Rockchip SoCs
> >>
> >> Hi Caesar,
> >>
> >> is there any reason to not use the existing thermal bindings? You can
> >> find a description in
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt and example code
> >> in omap, or in the patches for Tegra recently posted by Mikko
> >> Perttunen.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Tomeu
> >
> >
> > Why should I use the existing thermal bindings?
>
> Because otherwise, you are asking to merge duplicated code. There's a
> generic way to define thermal zones, trip points, cooling devices,
> etc. And also code to parse and plug them together. Why add
> soc-specific code to do the same?
>
> > I believe omap,tegar and rockchip are the three seperate thermals driver.
>
> Yes, and OMAP is already using the generic bindings, and the proposed
> patches for Tegra as well, and I think it would make sense for
> Rockchip to also use them (unless I'm missing something).
You are talking about drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c, right? Yes, I think
Rockchip should be using the same generic framework if possible.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-18 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-17 3:59 [PATCH v5 0/4] Rockchip soc thermal driver Caesar Wang
2014-09-17 3:59 ` Caesar Wang
[not found] ` <1410926353-15674-1-git-send-email-caesar.wang-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] thermal: rockchip: add driver for Thermal Caesar Wang
2014-09-17 3:59 ` Caesar Wang
2014-09-17 3:59 ` Caesar Wang
2014-09-17 17:02 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-09-17 17:02 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-09-18 8:31 ` Caesar Wang
2014-09-18 8:31 ` Caesar Wang
2014-09-18 17:02 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-09-18 17:02 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-09-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: document Rockchip thermal Caesar Wang
2014-09-17 3:59 ` Caesar Wang
[not found] ` <1410926353-15674-3-git-send-email-caesar.wang-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-17 19:48 ` Doug Anderson
2014-09-17 19:48 ` Doug Anderson
2014-09-17 19:48 ` Doug Anderson
2014-09-17 20:13 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-09-17 20:13 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-09-18 2:33 ` Caesar Wang
2014-09-18 2:33 ` Caesar Wang
2014-09-18 9:27 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2014-09-18 9:27 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2014-09-18 13:25 ` Caesar Wang
2014-09-18 13:25 ` Caesar Wang
2014-09-18 14:19 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2014-09-18 14:19 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2014-09-18 17:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2014-09-18 17:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-09-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] ARM: dts: add main Thermal info to rk3288 Caesar Wang
2014-09-17 3:59 ` Caesar Wang
2014-09-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] ARM: dts: enable Thermal on rk3288-evb board Caesar Wang
2014-09-17 3:59 ` Caesar Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140918171809.GD14809@core.coreip.homeip.net \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=addy.ke@rock-chips.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=caesar.wang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=cf@rock-chips.com \
--cc=cjf@rock-chips.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=huangtao@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net \
--cc=zyf@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.