From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Subject: Re: CPU scheduler to TXQ binding? (ixgbe vs. igb)
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:59:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140918175910.5fc67efa@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411054951.7106.272.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:42:31 -0700
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 06:41 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > Last but not least, there is the fact that networking stacks use
> > mod_timer() to arm timers, and that by default, timer migration is on
> > ( cf /proc/sys/kernel/timer_migration )
I don't have this proc file on my system, as I didn't select CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG.
> > We probably should use mod_timer_pinned(), but I could not really see
> > any difference.
>
> Hmm... actually its quite noticeable :
Interesting impact.
I'm looking for some 1G hardware without multiqueue, so I can get
around this measurement constraint. And possibly turning it down to
100Mbit/s, so I can more easily measure the HoL blocking effect.
> # ./super_netperf 500 --google-pacing-rate 3000000 -H lpaa24 -l 1000 &
> ...
Interesting option "--google-pacing-rate" ;-)
> # echo 1 >/proc/sys/kernel/timer_migration
> # vmstat 5
> procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
> r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
> 2 0 0 261178336 15812 1001880 0 0 5 1 185 217 0 4 96 0
> 0 0 0 261173456 15812 1001884 0 0 0 0 1548055 35472 0 15 85 0
> 2 0 0 261174880 15812 1001888 0 0 0 0 1533309 35163 0 15 85 0
> 3 0 0 261176768 15812 1001896 0 0 0 0 1533442 35694 0 15 85 0
[]
> # echo 0 >/proc/sys/kernel/timer_migration
> # vmstat 5
> procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
> r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
> 2 0 0 261172784 15812 1001936 0 0 5 1 165 228 0 5 95 0
> 1 0 0 261175776 15812 1001940 0 0 0 0 1187446 32238 0 12 88 0
> 2 0 0 261172752 15812 1001940 0 0 0 3 1166697 32060 0 12 88 0
Quite significant, both interrupts and especially CPU system usage drop.
> I am tempted to simply :
>
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index 9c3f823e76a9..868c6bcd7221 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -2288,10 +2288,10 @@ void sk_send_sigurg(struct sock *sk)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_send_sigurg);
>
> -void sk_reset_timer(struct sock *sk, struct timer_list* timer,
> +void sk_reset_timer(struct sock *sk, struct timer_list *timer,
> unsigned long expires)
> {
> - if (!mod_timer(timer, expires))
> + if (!mod_timer_pinned(timer, expires))
> sock_hold(sk);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_reset_timer);
>
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-18 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-17 13:26 CPU scheduler to TXQ binding? (ixgbe vs. igb) Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-17 14:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-17 14:55 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-17 14:59 ` Alexander Duyck
2014-09-18 6:56 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-18 7:28 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-18 13:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 13:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 15:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 15:59 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2014-09-18 16:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 18:57 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-18 16:07 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140918175910.5fc67efa@redhat.com \
--to=jbrouer@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.