All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>
To: Varka Bhadram <varkabhadram@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
	alan@signal11.us, Varka Bhadram <varkab@cdac.in>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bluetooth-next v2 0/3] cleanup for mrf24j40 driver
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 11:06:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140919090611.GA17051@omega> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411101911-12462-1-git-send-email-varkab@cdac.in>

Hi Varka,

nice to read you again. :-) I already thought that I was maybe a little
bit too harsh to you for explaining changing dev->add_len during runtime
will occur in unexcept behaviour. Sorry.

Nevertheless welcome back. I want to apply it when Alan finally sends a
"Acked-by: ...", but why is this tagged with bluetooth-next?

There are other mrf24j40 patches around and it's better to send this in
a whole patch series when all patches are on wpan-next/testing. Then I
will send these patches to bluetooth-next. When applied I will rebase
the wpan-next/master to bluetooth-next/master.

Only 6LOWPAN GENERIC patches should be send to bluetooth-next.

- Alex

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-09-19  9:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-19  4:45 [PATCH bluetooth-next v2 0/3] cleanup for mrf24j40 driver Varka Bhadram
2014-09-19  4:45 ` [PATCH bluetooth-next v2 1/3] mrf24j40: fix Missing a blank line after declarations Varka Bhadram
2014-09-19  4:45 ` [PATCH bluetooth-next v2 2/3] mrf24j40: remove unnecessary return statement Varka Bhadram
2014-09-19  4:45 ` [PATCH bluetooth-next v2 3/3] mrf24j40: use pr_* / dev_* instead of printk() Varka Bhadram
2014-09-19  9:06 ` Alexander Aring [this message]
2014-09-19  9:31   ` [PATCH bluetooth-next v2 0/3] cleanup for mrf24j40 driver Varka Bhadram
2014-09-19  9:41     ` Alexander Aring
2014-09-19  9:44       ` Varka Bhadram
2014-09-19  9:48         ` Alexander Aring
2014-09-19 10:26           ` Varka Bhadram

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140919090611.GA17051@omega \
    --to=alex.aring@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan@signal11.us \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=varkab@cdac.in \
    --cc=varkabhadram@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.