From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XUyKF-0007kf-Hl for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:34:16 +0000 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:33:53 -0400 From: Vivek Goyal Subject: Re: [RFC] autokdump - automated kdump testsuite Message-ID: <20140919133353.GD2190@redhat.com> References: <145412866.25258463.1411119061796.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <293476264.25264480.1411120345360.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20140919132236.GB2190@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140919132236.GB2190@redhat.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: CAI Qian Cc: ltp-list , crash-utility , kexec , linux-kernel , kexec kdump redhat mailing list On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 09:22:36AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 05:52:25AM -0400, CAI Qian wrote: > > I plan to release an automated kdump testsuite that will be > > So will this be a standalone test suit? Can it be merged with > something already existing say, LTP. Also how about calling it just kdumptest. autokdump feels more like as if there have been improvements to kdump mechanism and there is improved method named "autokdump". kdumptest is more intuitive and it being "auto" is more or less implied. Thanks Vivek _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XUyKO-0000ek-2I for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:34:24 +0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1XUyKM-0007BE-Qr for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:34:24 +0000 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:33:53 -0400 From: Vivek Goyal Message-ID: <20140919133353.GD2190@redhat.com> References: <145412866.25258463.1411119061796.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <293476264.25264480.1411120345360.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20140919132236.GB2190@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140919132236.GB2190@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [LTP] [RFC] autokdump - automated kdump testsuite List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: CAI Qian Cc: ltp-list , crash-utility , kexec , linux-kernel , kexec kdump redhat mailing list On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 09:22:36AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 05:52:25AM -0400, CAI Qian wrote: > > I plan to release an automated kdump testsuite that will be > > So will this be a standalone test suit? Can it be merged with > something already existing say, LTP. Also how about calling it just kdumptest. autokdump feels more like as if there have been improvements to kdump mechanism and there is improved method named "autokdump". kdumptest is more intuitive and it being "auto" is more or less implied. Thanks Vivek ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756595AbaISNeZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:34:25 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22666 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753398AbaISNeY (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:34:24 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:33:53 -0400 From: Vivek Goyal To: CAI Qian Cc: ltp-list , kexec kdump redhat mailing list , kexec , linux-kernel , crash-utility Subject: Re: [RFC] autokdump - automated kdump testsuite Message-ID: <20140919133353.GD2190@redhat.com> References: <145412866.25258463.1411119061796.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <293476264.25264480.1411120345360.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20140919132236.GB2190@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140919132236.GB2190@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 09:22:36AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 05:52:25AM -0400, CAI Qian wrote: > > I plan to release an automated kdump testsuite that will be > > So will this be a standalone test suit? Can it be merged with > something already existing say, LTP. Also how about calling it just kdumptest. autokdump feels more like as if there have been improvements to kdump mechanism and there is improved method named "autokdump". kdumptest is more intuitive and it being "auto" is more or less implied. Thanks Vivek