From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Cc: sameo@linux.intel.com, lee.jones@linaro.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
johan@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: viperboard: allocate I/O buffer separately
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:35:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140923073541.GM5237@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411414759-7056-2-git-send-email-octavian.purdila@intel.com>
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:39:18PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> Currently the I/O buffer is allocated part of the device status
> structure, potentially sharing the same cache line with other members
> in this structure.
>
> Allocate the buffer separately, to avoid the I/O operations corrupting
> the device status structure due to cache line sharing.
>
> Compiled tested only as I don't have access to hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/viperboard.c | 8 ++++++++
> include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c b/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
> index e00f534..5f62f4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,12 @@ static int vprbrd_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> + vb->buf = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vprbrd_i2c_write_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (vb->buf == NULL) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto error;
This will cause a kref imbalance as you have a usb_put_dev in error,
but haven't done the get yet.
> + }
> +
> mutex_init(&vb->lock);
>
> vb->usb_dev = usb_get_dev(interface_to_usbdev(interface));
Here's the get.
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-23 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-22 19:39 [PATCH v2 0/2] mfd: viperboard: cleanups and fix for cache line sharing Octavian Purdila
2014-09-22 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: viperboard: allocate I/O buffer separately Octavian Purdila
2014-09-23 7:35 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2014-09-23 7:38 ` Johan Hovold
2014-09-23 7:47 ` Johan Hovold
2014-09-24 10:12 ` Lee Jones
2014-09-24 10:28 ` Johan Hovold
2014-09-24 12:00 ` Lee Jones
2014-09-24 12:26 ` Johan Hovold
2014-09-24 12:34 ` Octavian Purdila
2014-09-24 12:34 ` Johan Hovold
2014-09-22 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mfd: viperboard: remove redundant OOM message and NULL pointer check Octavian Purdila
2014-09-24 10:13 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140923073541.GM5237@localhost \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=octavian.purdila@intel.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.