From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: LTP recv/recvmsg tests failing on 3.17
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:11:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140923091108.2788de76@as> (raw)
LTP tests recv01, recvfrom01 and recvmsg01 are reporting failure on
their "invalid flags" tests on 3.17. They pass a value of -1 for flags
and expect to get EINVAL back, but now they get EAGAIN. It looks like
this is due to:
commit 4ed2d765dfaccff5ebdac68e2064b59125033a3b
Author: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Date: Mon Aug 4 22:11:49 2014 -0400
net-timestamp: TCP timestamping
which adds this hunk to net/ipv4/tcp.c:
@@ -1617,6 +1630,9 @@ int tcp_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
struct sk_buff *skb;
u32 urg_hole = 0;
+ if (unlikely(flags & MSG_ERRQUEUE))
+ return ip_recv_error(sk, msg, len, addr_len);
+
if (sk_can_busy_loop(sk) && skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue) &&
(sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED))
sk_busy_loop(sk, nonblock);
Before this change, the first flag tested was MSG_OOB, which eventually
causes EINVAL to be returned. Now this flag gets tested first, and
ip_recv_err() returns EAGAIN.
LTP setting every flag and expecting behavior to remain unchanged is
probably wrong, but is EAGAIN correct here? I can't find any spec for
this.
next reply other threads:[~2014-09-23 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-23 14:11 Chuck Ebbert [this message]
2014-09-23 14:57 ` LTP recv/recvmsg tests failing on 3.17 Willem de Bruijn
2014-09-23 15:39 ` Chuck Ebbert
2014-09-23 16:24 ` Willem de Bruijn
2014-09-23 15:59 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140923091108.2788de76@as \
--to=cebbert.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.