From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH 38/46] Move xenconsoled to libexec Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:56:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20140923125650.GJ10033@aepfle.de> References: <1411390835-7348-1-git-send-email-olaf@aepfle.de> <1411390835-7348-39-git-send-email-olaf@aepfle.de> <1411468836.14989.77.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1411468836.14989.77.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Keir Fraser , David Scott , Stefano Stabellini , George Dunlap , Tim Deegan , Ian Jackson , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Jan Beulich , Samuel Thibault List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Sep 23, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 15:00 +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > > xenconsoled is started by runlevel scripts, its not supposed to be > > called by admin. So move it out of the way into LIBEXEC_BIN. > > It's pretty normal/conventional for daemons to be in $sbin, I think. > > I think the point is that although daemons might normally be started by > an initscript it is also allowable (and occasionally useful) to start > them by hand or via other means. In contrast to something like the > libxl-save-helper which is something which does belong in libexec. > > I'd be reluctant to change this without a reference to something like > the FHS to back up why it should be in libexec. Is it possible to restart the daemons which I move to libexec? I think at least xenstored can not be restarted. So it does not make much sense to have it in $sbin, because its a run once thing. Olaf