From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id C7970E00849; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 09:10:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (richardcochran[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.212.176 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (mail-wi0-f176.google.com [209.85.212.176]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBD0E005BD for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 09:09:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id fb4so7240559wid.9 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 09:09:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Tks50zI3To3oIr3P6u0aTZvmQlvv3+0m2kcMuluco8c=; b=I4n3dPsJtEouwZxH1+582GC07ib3wbnK51ZKXXAt4sVSOZXKGpie/bX7OSHS3MPIm0 Z9BlihlIOq/ijJfHLCSsd6jDLXdSggZ2VBMEiOePOftpa9Ko4TXPs6735GBk8GfhRa8o e9zZLiPu4d30ZB1FG7vACaj3ix368JVn4NajKXAyi088Rt62a7/u4Y8uT/vIYnNUb0pZ ZAOMyg9pINGJRgLLtvfJCBtYV+lUOYIV9z532VB17yD8fE66Hxcy/3I3jX4TXMX6knrL 5NX+ZkWLTeNxJI8aUaHZ8+G/4jiVF4bvLSeZUE7Ztni61fUknZ6H/cPyDuQk43PIYFMB 46vg== X-Received: by 10.194.78.101 with SMTP id a5mr8842906wjx.118.1411574992963; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 09:09:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (194-166-227-112.adsl.highway.telekom.at. [194.166.227.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ba3sm174547wib.10.2014.09.24.09.09.51 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Sep 2014 09:09:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:09:49 +0200 From: Richard Cochran To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org Message-ID: <20140924160949.GB9904@localhost.localdomain> References: <20140924152903.GA9904@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140924152903.GA9904@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: (off topic) exporting a SDK with Qt5 X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:10:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Answering my own question, I found this recent thread. http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2014-September/097987.html So I switched meta-qt5 from daisy to master, and now I bake: bitbake meta-toolchain-qt5 In this case, the URLs in the daisy recipes are broken. Is there any kind of maintenance doing on for Yocto branches to fix this kind of bug? What is the policy, if any? I ask because I have often tried to switch a layer to a newer version in order to get the fix for one issue, only to have either new issues appear, or to have issues with the other layers, or both. Thanks, Richard