All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20140924192945.GC1004@ilina-mac.local>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index eb77c06..d830771 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ On Wed, Sep 24 2014 at 11:53 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
 >>>> +- qcom,cpu: phandle for the CPU that the SPM block is attached to.
 >>>> +	This field is required on only for SPMs that control the CPU.
 >>>
->>> Let’s make this just cpu-handle instead of qcom,cpu.  The concept of a handle to a cpu is pretty generic.
+>>> Let?s make this just cpu-handle instead of qcom,cpu.  The concept of a handle to a cpu is pretty generic.
 >>>
 >> Okay. Will look into it.
 >> You mean just the property name, right?
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ It is, in this case. But its not something you deviate from the spec.
 >>>> +- qcom,saw2-delays: The SPM delay values that SPM sequences would refer to.
 >>>> +	The register for this property is MSM_SPM_REG_SAW2_SPM_DLY.
 >>>
->>> Didn’t Stephen asked about splitting this up? Or at least treating it as an array of 3 values?
+>>> Didn?t Stephen asked about splitting this up? Or at least treating it as an array of 3 values?
 >>>
 >> Yes he did. My response was similar to the clk-div values, its not
 >> something you can change without hardware spec documentation.
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ It is, in this case. But its not something you deviate from the spec.
 >> register. Splitting it up, doesnt help understanding/configuring the SPM
 >> any better, so didnt change it.
 >
->Hmm, will this value change from SPM to SPM on the same SoC?  I’m not a fan of allowing random register values to get poked into the HW from DT.  While this one case might end up being acceptable, its a terrible practice and not something I want use in the habit of doing.
+>Hmm, will this value change from SPM to SPM on the same SoC?  I?m not a fan of allowing random register values to get poked into the HW from DT.  While this one case might end up being acceptable, its a terrible practice and not something I want use in the habit of doing.
 >
 Ah. Tough proposition! The SPM sequence is a bunch of random register
 values, which is not open to interpretation without the programming
@@ -133,19 +133,19 @@ with it.
 >>>> +
 >>>> +- qcom,saw2-spm-cmd-wfi: The WFI command sequence
 >>>
->>> probably add something like: “array of bytes …” (want to convey the data type somehow, is there a max length?)
+>>> probably add something like: ?array of bytes ?? (want to convey the data type somehow, is there a max length?)
 >>>
 >> Okay.
 >>
 >>>> +- qcom,saw2-spm-cmd-spc: The Standalone PC command sequence
 >>>
->>> probably add something like: “array of bytes …” (want to convey the data type somehow, is there a max length?)
+>>> probably add something like: ?array of bytes ?? (want to convey the data type somehow, is there a max length?)
 >>>
 >> Okay.
 >>
 >>>> +
 >>>> +Example:
->>>> +	spm@f9089000 {
+>>>> +	spm at f9089000 {
 >>>> +		compatible = "qcom,spm-v2.1";
 >>>> +		#address-cells = <1>;
 >>>> +		#size-cells = <1>;
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ with it.
 >>>
 >> --
 >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
->> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
+>> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
 >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 >
 >-- 
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index f3ae068..14425a1 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -3,18 +3,10 @@
  "ref\0F743E5F0-28C1-4A9D-A27D-73EA70A01B46@codeaurora.org\0"
  "ref\020140924172151.GD422@ilina-mac\0"
  "ref\04BFC9B4E-A3D0-422E-9B55-0DB9F4B04EE9@codeaurora.org\0"
- "From\0Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] qcom: spm: Add Subsystem Power Manager driver\0"
+ "From\0lina.iyer@linaro.org (Lina Iyer)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH v6 1/5] qcom: spm: Add Subsystem Power Manager driver\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 24 Sep 2014 13:29:45 -0600\0"
- "To\0Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>\0"
- "Cc\0sboyd@codeaurora.org"
-  daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
-  linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
-  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
-  khilman@linaro.org
-  msivasub@codeaurora.org
-  lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com
- " linux-pm@vger.kernel.org\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Wed, Sep 24 2014 at 11:53 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:\n"
@@ -85,7 +77,7 @@
  ">>>> +- qcom,cpu: phandle for the CPU that the SPM block is attached to.\n"
  ">>>> +\tThis field is required on only for SPMs that control the CPU.\n"
  ">>>\n"
- ">>> Let\342\200\231s make this just cpu-handle instead of qcom,cpu.  The concept of a handle to a cpu is pretty generic.\n"
+ ">>> Let?s make this just cpu-handle instead of qcom,cpu.  The concept of a handle to a cpu is pretty generic.\n"
  ">>>\n"
  ">> Okay. Will look into it.\n"
  ">> You mean just the property name, right?\n"
@@ -113,7 +105,7 @@
  ">>>> +- qcom,saw2-delays: The SPM delay values that SPM sequences would refer to.\n"
  ">>>> +\tThe register for this property is MSM_SPM_REG_SAW2_SPM_DLY.\n"
  ">>>\n"
- ">>> Didn\342\200\231t Stephen asked about splitting this up? Or at least treating it as an array of 3 values?\n"
+ ">>> Didn?t Stephen asked about splitting this up? Or at least treating it as an array of 3 values?\n"
  ">>>\n"
  ">> Yes he did. My response was similar to the clk-div values, its not\n"
  ">> something you can change without hardware spec documentation.\n"
@@ -121,7 +113,7 @@
  ">> register. Splitting it up, doesnt help understanding/configuring the SPM\n"
  ">> any better, so didnt change it.\n"
  ">\n"
- ">Hmm, will this value change from SPM to SPM on the same SoC?  I\342\200\231m not a fan of allowing random register values to get poked into the HW from DT.  While this one case might end up being acceptable, its a terrible practice and not something I want use in the habit of doing.\n"
+ ">Hmm, will this value change from SPM to SPM on the same SoC?  I?m not a fan of allowing random register values to get poked into the HW from DT.  While this one case might end up being acceptable, its a terrible practice and not something I want use in the habit of doing.\n"
  ">\n"
  "Ah. Tough proposition! The SPM sequence is a bunch of random register\n"
  "values, which is not open to interpretation without the programming\n"
@@ -152,19 +144,19 @@
  ">>>> +\n"
  ">>>> +- qcom,saw2-spm-cmd-wfi: The WFI command sequence\n"
  ">>>\n"
- ">>> probably add something like: \342\200\234array of bytes \342\200\246\342\200\235 (want to convey the data type somehow, is there a max length?)\n"
+ ">>> probably add something like: ?array of bytes ?? (want to convey the data type somehow, is there a max length?)\n"
  ">>>\n"
  ">> Okay.\n"
  ">>\n"
  ">>>> +- qcom,saw2-spm-cmd-spc: The Standalone PC command sequence\n"
  ">>>\n"
- ">>> probably add something like: \342\200\234array of bytes \342\200\246\342\200\235 (want to convey the data type somehow, is there a max length?)\n"
+ ">>> probably add something like: ?array of bytes ?? (want to convey the data type somehow, is there a max length?)\n"
  ">>>\n"
  ">> Okay.\n"
  ">>\n"
  ">>>> +\n"
  ">>>> +Example:\n"
- ">>>> +\tspm@f9089000 {\n"
+ ">>>> +\tspm at f9089000 {\n"
  ">>>> +\t\tcompatible = \"qcom,spm-v2.1\";\n"
  ">>>> +\t\t#address-cells = <1>;\n"
  ">>>> +\t\t#size-cells = <1>;\n"
@@ -188,7 +180,7 @@
  ">>>\n"
  ">> --\n"
  ">> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-arm-msm\" in\n"
- ">> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org\n"
+ ">> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org\n"
  ">> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html\n"
  ">\n"
  ">-- \n"
@@ -196,4 +188,4 @@
  ">Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation\n"
  >
 
-6a4583152374ffca37827fec783f03aa6cf34dc232358f3e665b77c20a9f607e
+fea01820142ad9b5ec506fde403221a779a767b5d31cd75132b8a6911229fd9b

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.