From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: VRFs and the scalability of namespaces
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:52:41 -0700
Message-ID: <20140926165241.59cf8a60@urahara>
References: <5425EAA6.7040302@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com ([209.85.192.174]:37945 "EHLO
	mail-pd0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754739AbaIZXwx (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 26 Sep 2014 19:52:53 -0400
Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id g10so13096746pdj.5
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5425EAA6.7040302@gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:37:26 -0600
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Eric:
> 
> As you suggested [1] I am starting a new thread to discuss scalability 
> problems using namespaces for VRFs.
> 

Whining without suggesting a solution or providing code will probably result
in no action.