From: Neil Horman <nhorman-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
To: "Wiles,
Roger Keith"
<keith.wiles-CWA4WttNNZF54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "<dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>" <dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Bulk dequeue of packets and the returned values, question
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 16:44:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140928204401.GB4012@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F1520FAF-173B-44AA-8A2F-131520089EC1-CWA4WttNNZF54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 06:04:42PM +0000, Wiles, Roger Keith wrote:
> I am also looking at the bulk dequeue routines, which the ring can be fixed or variable. On fixed < 0 on error is returned and 0 if successful. On a variable ring < 0 on error or n on success, but I think n can be zero in the variable case, correct?
>
Yes, that seems right.
> If these are true then why not have the routines return < 0 on error and >= 0 on success. Which means a dequeue from a fixed ring would return only ’requested size n’ or < 0 if you error off the 0 case. The 0 case could be OK, if you allow zero to be return on a empty ring for the fixed ring case.
>
> Does this make sense to anyone?
>
I agree, I don't see why the behavior is bifurcated the way it is, its
nonsensical.
Neil
> Thanks
> ++Keith
>
> Keith Wiles, Principal Technologist with CTO office, Wind River mobile 972-213-5533
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-28 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-28 18:04 Bulk dequeue of packets and the returned values, question Wiles, Roger Keith
[not found] ` <F1520FAF-173B-44AA-8A2F-131520089EC1-CWA4WttNNZF54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-28 20:44 ` Neil Horman [this message]
2014-09-28 22:23 ` Venkatesan, Venky
[not found] ` <54288A70.9020902-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-28 22:36 ` Neil Horman
2014-09-28 23:06 ` Wiles, Roger Keith
[not found] ` <F188E589-7C3A-44D6-9DBB-F9908FD1FEAC-CWA4WttNNZF54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-29 12:10 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-09-29 12:26 ` Neil Horman
2014-09-29 12:30 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
[not found] ` <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725821387594-kPTMFJFq+rGvNW/NfzhIbrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-29 14:57 ` Wiles, Roger Keith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140928204401.GB4012@localhost.localdomain \
--to=nhorman-2xusbdqka4r54taoqtywwq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=keith.wiles-CWA4WttNNZF54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.