From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shawn Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] ARM: imx53: add cpufreq support Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 20:00:37 +0800 Message-ID: <20140929120035.GB14087@tiger> References: <1411738864-26549-1-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> <1411738864-26549-6-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> <20140928041513.GI12999@dragon> <1411979628.2625.5.camel@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Received: from mail-bn1on0148.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.110.148]:3904 "EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753200AbaI2MBJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:01:09 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1411979628.2625.5.camel@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Lucas Stach Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Mark Brown , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@pengutronix.de On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:33:48AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 28.09.2014, 12:15 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo: > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 03:41:04PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > > > Instanciate device for the generic cpufreq-dt driver. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach > > > > I assume that I should only apply this patch after the cpufreq-dt change > > gets merged and shows up on my base. > > > > Shawn > > > I would think its safe to merge this patch. The cpufreq-dt change will > be merged with 3.18. Until then the worst that could happen is that the > cpufreq driver doesn't bind to the mx5 cpu device. Ah, right. The device will not bind on my tree, so it's safe to apply it right away. Applied, thanks. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shawn.guo@freescale.com (Shawn Guo) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 20:00:37 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v2 6/6] ARM: imx53: add cpufreq support In-Reply-To: <1411979628.2625.5.camel@pengutronix.de> References: <1411738864-26549-1-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> <1411738864-26549-6-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> <20140928041513.GI12999@dragon> <1411979628.2625.5.camel@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20140929120035.GB14087@tiger> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:33:48AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 28.09.2014, 12:15 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo: > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 03:41:04PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > > > Instanciate device for the generic cpufreq-dt driver. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach > > > > I assume that I should only apply this patch after the cpufreq-dt change > > gets merged and shows up on my base. > > > > Shawn > > > I would think its safe to merge this patch. The cpufreq-dt change will > be merged with 3.18. Until then the worst that could happen is that the > cpufreq driver doesn't bind to the mx5 cpu device. Ah, right. The device will not bind on my tree, so it's safe to apply it right away. Applied, thanks.