From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bob Picco Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 21:03:22 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] sparc64: MM/IRQ patch queue. Message-Id: <20140929210322.GG24131@zareason> List-Id: References: <20140927.142812.2031647355756795530.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20140927.142812.2031647355756795530.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Hi, David Miller wrote: [Mon Sep 29 2014, 04:15:43PM EDT] > From: David Miller > Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 00:35:25 -0400 (EDT) > > > From: Bob Picco > > Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:46:51 -0400 > > > >>> Anyways, let me know how these work for you. I'll be running tests > >>> on my T4-2 all weekend. > >> I'll commence with T5-2 which is local to me. > >> > >> M7-4 came up with an older kernel of mine but with hardware faults. > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > I added the following to my tree to deal with the MAX_BANKS issue, > > I hope it helps the case you talked about, and it's essentially > > free :-) > > Bob, I know you're probably busy, but any updates wrt. testing > this series? Apologies, I've been contexting switching heavily. My local T4-2 and T5-2 seem solid for THP "always" and large kernel parallel makes. I've seen no issues. There is an issue with spec-jbb. I'm hoping to have dedicated time for this issue during the week. I've not had time to examine the DEBUG_PAGEALLOC issue. I'll also test M7, faults permitting. I'll commit to resolving these issues before the merge window closes. Obviously it is your final decision that matters. > you're welcome and thanx > Thanks.