From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:40:56 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] package/clamav: New package In-Reply-To: <1411915333-5976-1-git-send-email-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> References: <1411915333-5976-1-git-send-email-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> Message-ID: <20140930194056.1e1801a2@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Bernd Kuhls, On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 16:42:12 +0200, Bernd Kuhls wrote: > diff --git a/package/Config.in b/package/Config.in > index db06310..26dc69c 100644 > --- a/package/Config.in > +++ b/package/Config.in > @@ -917,6 +917,7 @@ menu "Miscellaneous" > source "package/aespipe/Config.in" > source "package/bc/Config.in" > source "package/collectd/Config.in" > + source "package/clamav/Config.in" Nit: clamav is before collectd by alphabetic ordering. > diff --git a/package/clamav/Config.in b/package/clamav/Config.in > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..9840228 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/package/clamav/Config.in > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ > +config BR2_PACKAGE_CLAMAV > + select BR2_PACKAGE_OPENSSL > + depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS > + depends on BR2_USE_MMU # fork() > + bool "clamav" Though it's not a written rule, I generally prefer to have the bool "pkgname" line as the first line, before the select and dependencies. > diff --git a/package/clamav/clamav-0002-static_linking.patch b/package/clamav/clamav-0002-static_linking.patch > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..71e4590 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/package/clamav/clamav-0002-static_linking.patch > @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ > +Fix detection of statically linked libraries > + > +Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls Has this patch been sent upstream like the first one? Also, in the patch file name, I'd prefer to see static-linking.patch rather than static_linking.patch. We tend to use - more commonly as a separator in patch file names. > diff --git a/package/clamav/clamav.mk b/package/clamav/clamav.mk > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..2db8577 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/package/clamav/clamav.mk > @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ > +################################################################################ > +# > +# clamav > +# > +################################################################################ > + > +CLAMAV_VERSION = 0.98.4 > +CLAMAV_SITE = http://sourceforge.net/projects/clamav/files/clamav/$(CLAMAV_VERSION) > +CLAMAV_LICENSE = GPLv2 I've checked the license and it's indeed GPLv2 only, not GPLv2+. > +CLAMAV_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING There are many other COPYING files, for some portion of source code that ClamAV has imported. Even though the whole result is distributed under GPLv2, I believe those additional COPYING.* files must be kept, because some of them are related to BSD licensed software that requires the copyright holder name to be preserved. > +CLAMAV_AUTORECONF = YES > +CLAMAV_DEPENDENCIES = openssl zlib \ > + $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_LIBICONV),libiconv) \ Same comment as for the dovecot package: you should have a select BR2_PACKAGE_LIBICONV if !BR2_ENABLE_LOCALE if iconv support is needed for your package. > + $(if $(BR2_NEEDS_GETTEXT),gettext) See http://buildroot.org/downloads/manual/manual.html#_gettext_integration_and_interaction_with_packages for details about the gettext handling: you need to do some stuff in your Config.in file. > + > +# mmap cannot be detected when cross-compiling, needed for mempool support > +CLAMAV_CONF_ENV = \ > + ac_cv_c_mmap_private=yes > + > +CLAMAV_CONF_OPT = \ > + --sysconfdir=/etc \ > + --with-dbdir=/var/lib/clamav \ > + --with-openssl=$(STAGING_DIR)/usr \ > + --with-zlib=$(STAGING_DIR)/usr \ Are OpenSSL and Zlib mandatory or optional? Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com