All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] perf stat: Fix AGGR_CORE segfault on multi-socket system
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 14:08:29 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141001170829.GD2799@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412174192-7010-2-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org>

Em Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 03:36:22PM +0100, Matt Fleming escreveu:
> From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
> 
> When printing the stats associated with a counter in AGGR_MODE mode, the
> 'cpu' argument represents an encoded socket and core_id, not a 'cpu'.
> Using it as an index into the any of the *_stats[MAX_NR_CPUS] arrays
> generates a SIGSEGV if the encoded socket id is non-zero.
> 
> Follow the AGGR_GLOBAL case and reset the cpu index to 0.

So, is this still needed after applying Andi's patch:

  perf stat: Fix --per-core on multi socket systems

  https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/commit/?h=perf/core&id=da88c7f78d842a6938d9adde6af87a2ce262051d

Or should this be applied on top of that one, after fixing up the
conflicts?

- Arnaldo
 
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> index b22c62f80078..53bd6b729498 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> @@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ static void abs_printout(int id, int nr, struct perf_evsel *evsel, double avg)
>  
>  	aggr_printout(evsel, id, nr);
>  
> -	if (aggr_mode == AGGR_GLOBAL)
> +	if (aggr_mode == AGGR_GLOBAL || aggr_mode == AGGR_CORE)
>  		cpu = 0;
>  
>  	fprintf(output, fmt, avg, csv_sep);
> -- 
> 1.9.3

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-01 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-01 14:36 [PATCH v2 00/11] perf: Intel Cache QoS Monitoring support Matt Fleming
2014-10-01 14:36 ` [PATCH 01/11] perf stat: Fix AGGR_CORE segfault on multi-socket system Matt Fleming
2014-10-01 17:08   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2014-10-01 20:37     ` Matt Fleming
2014-10-01 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] perf tools: Refactor unit and scale function parameters Matt Fleming
2014-10-01 17:09   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-10-01 14:36 ` [PATCH 03/11] perf tools: Parse event per-package info files Matt Fleming
2014-10-01 14:36 ` [PATCH 04/11] perf: Make perf_cgroup_from_task() global Matt Fleming
2014-10-01 14:36 ` [PATCH 05/11] perf: Add ->count() function to read per-package counters Matt Fleming
2014-10-01 14:36 ` [PATCH 06/11] perf: Move cgroup init before PMU ->event_init() Matt Fleming
2014-10-01 14:36 ` [PATCH 07/11] x86: Add support for Intel Cache QoS Monitoring (CQM) detection Matt Fleming
2014-10-01 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] perf/x86/intel: Add Intel Cache QoS Monitoring support Matt Fleming
2014-10-01 14:36 ` [PATCH 09/11] perf/x86/intel: Implement LRU monitoring ID allocation for CQM Matt Fleming
2014-10-01 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] perf/x86/intel: Support task events with Intel CQM Matt Fleming
2014-10-01 14:36 ` [PATCH 11/11] perf/x86/intel: Perform rotation on Intel CQM RMIDs Matt Fleming
2014-10-01 21:42 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] perf: Intel Cache QoS Monitoring support Andi Kleen
2014-10-02  6:51   ` Matt Fleming
2014-10-02  8:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-02 15:04     ` Andi Kleen
2014-10-02 17:49       ` Matt Fleming
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-09-24 14:04 [PATCH " Matt Fleming
2014-09-24 14:04 ` [PATCH 01/11] perf stat: Fix AGGR_CORE segfault on multi-socket system Matt Fleming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141001170829.GD2799@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.