From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [PATCH] AMD/guest_iommu: Disable guest iommu support Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 11:16:57 -0400 Message-ID: <20141002151657.GE32249@laptop.dumpdata.com> References: <1412258549-18671-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <542D5C4A.3050609@citrix.com> <542D8246020000780003C0E1@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <542D8246020000780003C0E1@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Andrew Cooper , Roberto Luongo , Aravind Gopalakrishnan , Suravee Suthikulpanit , Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 03:50:14PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 02.10.14 at 16:08, wrote: > > I forgot to explicitly indicate, but this is a bugfix and is therefore > > intended for inclusion in 4.5 > > And I continue to think that this also isn't necessary until pretty > late in the release process. We really need this indication for late > features coming in. I am OK with bugfixes being added in before RC0 without having to rubber-stamp them (as surely the maintainers know best whether the bug-fix should go in or not). But after RC0 I believe it makes sense to take a step to figure out the regression factor (if any). > > Jan > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel