From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Gordeev Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 5/6] AHCI: Optimize single IRQ interrupt processing Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 14:24:46 +0100 Message-ID: <20141006132445.GA18339@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> References: <20140923205710.GB17332@mtj.dyndns.org> <20140924104213.GA2695@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> <20140924130444.GA16555@htj.dyndns.org> <20140924140844.GB2695@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> <20140924143913.GH16555@htj.dyndns.org> <20141001153114.GE8971@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> <20141005022311.GD8549@htj.dyndns.org> <20141005161646.GB22223@mtj.dyndns.org> <20141006072710.GH8971@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> <20141006125817.GA18303@htj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57910 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752428AbaJFNQH (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:16:07 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141006125817.GA18303@htj.dyndns.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 08:58:17AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > I don't think we'd be able to move libata handling to block softirq > and probably end up just doing it from the irq context. Anyways, as > long as you're gonna keep working on it, I have no objection to the > proposed changes. Do you have a refreshed version or is the current > version good for inclusion? No, this one would not apply. I can send updated version on top of v5 I posted earlier. Should I? > tejun -- Regards, Alexander Gordeev agordeev@redhat.com