From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 17:20:17 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 4/5] regulator: Use gpio_is_valid In-Reply-To: <20141007130737.GH5042@pengutronix.de> References: <1412626635-7404-1-git-send-email-mpa@pengutronix.de> <1412626635-7404-5-git-send-email-mpa@pengutronix.de> <20141007120106.GY4609@sirena.org.uk> <20141007130737.GH5042@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20141007162017.GI4609@sirena.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 03:07:37PM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:01:06PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 10:17:14PM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote: > > > Use gpio_is_valid instead of custom check. > > Patches per driver please, this isn't just a mechanical transformation. > Okay, but you mean just patches 4 and 5 and not patch 2 right? Mostly, that was OK as it was just mechanical. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754418AbaJGQUl (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2014 12:20:41 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:38889 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754121AbaJGQUk (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2014 12:20:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 17:20:17 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Markus Pargmann Cc: Liam Girdwood , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de Message-ID: <20141007162017.GI4609@sirena.org.uk> References: <1412626635-7404-1-git-send-email-mpa@pengutronix.de> <1412626635-7404-5-git-send-email-mpa@pengutronix.de> <20141007120106.GY4609@sirena.org.uk> <20141007130737.GH5042@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v6ieFHm5OYqyo94Y" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141007130737.GH5042@pengutronix.de> X-Cookie: Everything you know is wrong! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] regulator: Use gpio_is_valid X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --v6ieFHm5OYqyo94Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 03:07:37PM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:01:06PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 10:17:14PM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote: > > > Use gpio_is_valid instead of custom check. > > Patches per driver please, this isn't just a mechanical transformation. > Okay, but you mean just patches 4 and 5 and not patch 2 right? Mostly, that was OK as it was just mechanical. --v6ieFHm5OYqyo94Y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUNBLAAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQ8mMH+gOd80gj4AsBab0LfNy5hlKC V7V5Pc97TizsaKEDDjB+IMM+VozXSHdlTzWe3pesc57rNpJhiTXujwKcUnNgZGHM 26tW+Cg2QDF+2cYi3+6ojpcaExn+Q/U7w7U3uckILbXDVx8x5BWLgvNQ/hrnjWXq Z3L2yB2QkIZINiwkobvRZtfW1JZcJmadvwGoUqr2XbRhcwUMVF7h6xxSWRp8Www2 GwOAi37f+oFv0Gfq7N3hFgQPr2p8KgvJs4VQdmApSqzZtEdewFrSZFWQUipTy/bX bJqSW7GamQsPq40+Loor6JdAMMYTABkorO2xNJhvf5Hhg5EOWgWV/KpZriXwmOU= =6Ucz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --v6ieFHm5OYqyo94Y--