Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Add sfi based cpufreq driver support

["Kasagar, Srinidhi" <srinidhi.kasagar@intel.com>]

On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 03:48:08PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 9 October 2014 23:38, Kasagar, Srinidhi <srinidhi.kasagar@intel.com> wrote:
> > I guess if you offline a cpu and then bring it online, then even though
> > there is no change in frequency, the core calls ->target_index().
> 
> No.
Hmm..I noticed later that I was doing cpumask_copy for my internal experiments.
Even in that case, as you pointed, the ->target_index() was not called
for the onlined CPU, but for the other related CPU. I should have 
debug printed policy->cpu in my ->target() implementation..:(

Anyway, thanks much for it. Will fix that useless check in the next version
of my patch.

Srinidhi