From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com,
geert+renesas@glider.be, david.daney@cavium.com,
paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, davidlohr@hp.com,
macro@linux-mips.org, chenhc@lemote.com, richard@nod.at,
zajec5@gmail.com, keescook@chromium.org, alex@alex-smith.me.uk,
tglx@linutronix.de, blogic@openwrt.org, jchandra@broadcom.com,
paul.burton@imgtec.com, qais.yousef@imgtec.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org,
markos.chandras@imgtec.com, dengcheng.zhu@imgtec.com,
manuel.lauss@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
lars.persson@axis.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] MIPS: Setup an instruction emulation in VDSO protected page instead of user stack
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 12:24:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141010102406.GK10832@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141010100334.GD4818@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org>
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:03:34AM +0100, James Hogan wrote:
> Hi Leonid,
>
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 05:07:11PM -0700, Leonid Yegoshin wrote:
> > On 10/09/2014 04:40 PM, James Hogan wrote:
> > > You could then avoid the whole stack and per-thread thing and just have
> > > a maximum of one emuframe dedicated to each thread or allocated on
> > > demand, and if there genuinely is a use case for nesting later on, worry
> > > about it then.
> >
> > As I understand, you propose to allocate some space in mmap.
>
> No, sorry if I wasn't very clear. I just mean that you can get away with
> a single kernel managed page per mm, with an emuframe allocated
> per-thread which that thread always uses, since they never nest, which I
> think simplifies the whole thing significantly.
>
> The allocation could be smarter than that of course in case you have
> thousands of threads and only a subset doing lots of FP branches, but a
> single thread should never need more than one at a time since the new
> signal behaviour effectively makes the delay slot emulation sort of
> atomic from the point of view of usermode, and the kernel knows for sure
> whether BD emulation is in progress from the PC.
>
> (If there is some other way than signals that I haven't taken into
> account that the emulation could be pre-empted then please let me know!)
Right, look at uprobes, it does exactly all this with a single page.
Slot allocation will block waiting for a free slot when all are in use.
If you need to support nesting, you need to do greedy slot allocation,
which is possible with limited nesting.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-10 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-09 20:00 [PATCH v2 0/3] MIPS executable stack protection Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-09 20:00 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-09 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] MIPS: mips_flush_cache_range is added Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-09 20:00 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-09 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] MIPS: Setup an instruction emulation in VDSO protected page instead of user stack Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-09 20:00 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-09 22:43 ` James Hogan
2014-10-09 22:43 ` James Hogan
2014-10-09 23:10 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-09 23:10 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-09 23:40 ` James Hogan
2014-10-09 23:40 ` James Hogan
2014-10-10 0:07 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-10 0:07 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-10 10:03 ` James Hogan
2014-10-10 10:03 ` James Hogan
2014-10-10 10:24 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-10-10 22:47 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-10 22:47 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-10 22:56 ` David Daney
2014-10-10 23:40 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-10 23:40 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-09 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] MIPS: set stack/data protection as non-executable Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-09 20:00 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-09 21:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] MIPS executable stack protection David Daney
2014-10-09 22:18 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-09 22:18 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-09 22:28 ` Paul Burton
2014-10-09 22:28 ` Paul Burton
2014-10-09 22:59 ` David Daney
2014-10-09 22:59 ` David Daney
2014-10-09 23:48 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2014-10-09 23:48 ` Leonid Yegoshin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141010102406.GK10832@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com \
--cc=Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@alex-smith.me.uk \
--cc=blogic@openwrt.org \
--cc=chenhc@lemote.com \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=dengcheng.zhu@imgtec.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=jchandra@broadcom.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=lars.persson@axis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=manuel.lauss@gmail.com \
--cc=markos.chandras@imgtec.com \
--cc=paul.burton@imgtec.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=qais.yousef@imgtec.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.