All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fs/namei.c: Misuse of sequence counts?
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 23:01:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141012040142.GB24463@zzz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141012001259.GM7996@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 01:12:59AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> Huh?  What's to guarantee that dentry hasn't become negative since the
> moment we'd fetched the seqcount?  _That_ is the problem we are dealing
> with here - link_path_walk() relies on nd->inode being non-NULL.

Hmm, I guess that makes sense.  So the code is actually verifying that the inode
is still the inode that was referenced from the current or root directory when
nd->path was set.  But couldn't the problem also be solved by setting nd->inode
directly in the fs->seq retry loops?  (The file descriptor case could be
'nd->inode = file_inode(f.file);'.)  Then there would be no need for the extra
read_seqcount_retry() just for the inode.  The patch you posted looks correct,
but I wonder if this approach would be better.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-12  4:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-11 22:58 fs/namei.c: Misuse of sequence counts? Eric Biggers
2014-10-11 23:46 ` Al Viro
2014-10-12  3:55   ` Eric Biggers
2014-10-12  4:29     ` Al Viro
2014-10-12  0:12 ` Al Viro
2014-10-12  4:01   ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2014-10-12  4:37     ` Al Viro
2014-10-12  4:51       ` Eric Biggers
2014-10-12  5:08       ` Eric Biggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141012040142.GB24463@zzz \
    --to=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.