From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + oom-pm-oom-killed-task-cannot-escape-pm-suspend.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 21:06:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141020190620.GA21882@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141020184657.GA505@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 10/20, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> On Fri 17-10-14 19:19:04, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > @@ -504,11 +516,13 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct
> > > pr_err("Kill process %d (%s) sharing same memory\n",
> > > task_pid_nr(p), p->comm);
> > > task_unlock(p);
> > > + atomic_inc(&oom_kills);
> >
> > Do we really need this? Can't freeze_processes() (ab)use oom_notify_list?
>
> I would really prefer not using oom_notify_list. It is just an ugly
> interface.
And to me oom_kills_count() is more ugly ;) But! of course this is
subjective, I am not going to insist.
> Reduce the race window by checking all tasks after OOM killer has been
> disabled. This is still not race free
Yes, thanks.
I only argued because this fact was not documented. And I agree that it
is hardly possible to close this race, and this patch makes the things
better.
I think this version is fine.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-20 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-17 17:19 + oom-pm-oom-killed-task-cannot-escape-pm-suspend.patch added to -mm tree Oleg Nesterov
2014-10-20 18:46 ` Michal Hocko
2014-10-20 19:06 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2014-10-20 19:56 ` oom && coredump Oleg Nesterov
2014-11-27 12:29 ` Michal Hocko
2014-11-27 17:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-12-02 8:59 ` Michal Hocko
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-10-14 22:07 + oom-pm-oom-killed-task-cannot-escape-pm-suspend.patch added to -mm tree akpm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141020190620.GA21882@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.