From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Make intel_pipe_has_type() and Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 22:29:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20141020202913.GX26941@phenom.ffwll.local> References: <1413802005-17267-4-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (mail-wi0-f177.google.com [209.85.212.177]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597206E122 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:29:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id fb4so61782wid.4 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:29:05 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: shuang.he@intel.com Cc: ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 07:14:48AM -0700, shuang.he@intel.com wrote: > Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang.he@intel.com) > -------------------------------------Summary------------------------------------- > Platform: baseline_drm_intel_nightly_pass_rate->patch_applied_pass_rate > BYT: pass/total=271/271->269/271 > PNV: pass/total=269/271->270/271 > ILK: pass/total=3/3->3/3 > IVB: pass/total=271/271->271/271 > SNB: pass/total=271/271->271/271 > HSW: pass/total=271/271->271/271 > BDW: pass/total=271/271->269/271 > -------------------------------------Detailed------------------------------------- > test_platform: test_suite, test_case, result_with_drm_intel_nightly->result_with_patch_applied > BYT: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_gem_concurrent_blit_gttX-bcs-gpu-read-after-write-forked, PASS->TIMEOUT > BYT: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_kms_setmode_invalid-clone-single-crtc, PASS->DMESG_WARN > PNV: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_gem_concurrent_blit_gtt-bcs-gpu-read-after-write-forked, TIMEOUT->PASS > BDW: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_gem_concurrent_blit_gtt-bcs-gpu-read-after-write-forked, PASS->TIMEOUT > BDW: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_gem_concurrent_blit_gttX-bcs-gpu-read-after-write-forked, PASS->TIMEOUT This smells a lot like flukes, since the patches really don't change functionality at all. Is there some way to filter out unstable testcases, or are these regressions real? In any case I've gone ahead and merged Ander's patches. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch