From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: Xen 4.5 development update (October update). RC1 on 24th Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:33:49 -0400 Message-ID: <20141020213349.GB11707@laptop.dumpdata.com> References: <20141017171401.1C26FF1C99@laptop.dumpdata.com> <5444F7DA0200007800040297@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XgKcV-0008Ta-UQ for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 21:36:04 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5444F7DA0200007800040297@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: artem.mygaiev@globallogic.com, ufimtseva@gmail.com, Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com, mengxu@cis.upenn.edu, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, feng.wu@intel.com, zhigang.x.wang@oracle.com, parth.dixit@linaro.org, Paul.Skentzos@dornerworks.com, vijay.kilari@gmail.com, rcojocaru@bitdefender.com, guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com, josh.whitehead@dornerworks.com, avanzini.arianna@gmail.com, anthony.perard@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, serge.broslavsky@linaro.org, yjhyun.yoo@samsung.com, olaf@aepfle.de, suriyan.r@gmail.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, Luis Rodriguez , julien.grall@linaro.org, robert.vanvossen@dornerworks.com, shantong.kang@intel.com, roy.franz@linaro.org, yang.z.zhang@intel.com, Paul.Durrant@citrix.com, dave.scott@cit.rix.com, msw@amazon.com, boris.ostrovsky@or List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:54:02AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 17.10.14 at 19:14, wrote: > > * Support controlling the max C-state sub-state (ok) > > v3 posted > > - Ross Lagerwall > > As much as I would like to see this merged, I don't think any progress > has been made towards finding a truly workable solution for the last > couple of months (v3 and some followup got posted on Jun 23). Hence > "ok" seems pretty bold, even if this is in the "for 4.6" section. I should probably remove all the 'ok' from the 4.6 material and just label them as unknown since some folks might pick them up (like I did with Malcolm's patch). > > > * 1TB slow destruction (ok) > > - Bob Liu > > Almost the same applies here - I don't think there was any update so > far at least heading in the right direction. True, Xen 4.6 material and it will need an refresh to what the proper way of going about this is. > > > * Xen HPET interrupt fixes (fair) > > behind migration v2 > > - Andrew Cooper > > This sits in the tools section, which surely is wrong. Right. Thank you for the correction. > > Jan >