From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Xen 4.5 development update (October update). RC1 on
	24th
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:35:22 -0400
Message-ID: <20141020213522.GC11707@laptop.dumpdata.com>
References: <20141017171401.1C26FF1C99@laptop.dumpdata.com>
	<CAG4opy8OEijEwZS6GDjeRKJ_XL-fVDW_Q+dDoPiCq00rVWdX0w@mail.gmail.com>
	<1413797649.12595.15.camel@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>) id 1XgKc1-0008PQ-3x
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 21:35:33 +0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1413797649.12595.15.camel@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:34:09AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> (trimming CC) 
> 
> > > == Completed ==
> > 
> > > *  ARM - MiniOS (done)
> > >    v7 posted
> > >   -  Thomas Leonard
> > 
> > This is not done (not all patches were applied). I posted v8 on 3 Oct
> > (no responses yet):
> > 
> > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-10/msg00395.html
> 
> Oh, somehow I missed this (I had it in my mind you were on vac I think).
> 
> WRT the freeze my thinking is that this isn't yet tied into the toplevel
> build so baring any interactions with either the common or x86 specific
> mini-os code there would be no downside to committing this even fairly
> late in the release cycle. I think whatever happens it would be
> considered at best "experimental" for 4.5.

<nods>

Thomas, could you repost it please with 'for-xen-4.5' on the patch
series.

Thank you.
> 
> Ian.
>