From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH] README: remove requirement for udev Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:52:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20141021145258.GA4691@aepfle.de> References: <1413898244-21158-1-git-send-email-olaf@aepfle.de> <20141021144150.GG10234@zion.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141021144150.GG10234@zion.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Wei Liu Cc: Ian Jackson , Ian Campbell , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Oct 21, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 03:30:44PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > > There is no requirement for udev during package build. It may be > > required at runtime even with libxl with run_hotplug_scripts=yes > > in xl.conf. > > > > Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering > > Cc: Ian Campbell > > Cc: Ian Jackson > > --- > > README | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/README b/README > > index a746259..412607a 100644 > > --- a/README > > +++ b/README > > @@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ provided by your OS distributor: > > * pkg-config > > * bridge-utils package (/sbin/brctl) > > * iproute package (/sbin/ip) > > These two don't look like requirement for package build either. The ones below neither, but I left them alone because last time this came up the conclusion was that its fine to have a mix or run and compile time requirements. If its now the time to clean this up I can spent some time and move this to the INSTALL file, as suggested in another thread. > > - * udev > > * GNU bison and GNU flex > > * GNU gettext > > * 16-bit x86 assembler, loader and compiler (dev86 rpm or bin86 & bcc debs) Olaf