From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: add missing forcewake put on i915_wa_registers()
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:35:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141022073522.GR4284@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141021174035.GF26941@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 07:40:35PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 02:58:08PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> >
> > Otherwise, a simple "cat" to the debugfs file can make the machine use
> > much more power than needed, and prevent it from runtime suspending.
> >
> > Related commit:
> >
> > commit 8452e1d173a16d9812422a2272c4ab0f0ba81057
> > Author: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> > Date: Tue Oct 7 17:21:26 2014 +0300
> > drm/i915: Build workaround list in ring initialization
> >
> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com>
> > Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/debugfs-read
> > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
>
> tbh I'm not even sure we want to do the manual forcewake get here -
> I915_READ will do it for us, and this is a debug interface. So no one
> should care about perf. Mika, is that right? If so I'd like to merge the
> inverse patch which drops the fw_get.
Don't we still need the idle msg disable+poll CSPWRFSM trick here on
gen8? That also needs forcewake around it.
> -Daniel
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > index 9600285..36a4baa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > @@ -2671,6 +2671,7 @@ static int i915_wa_registers(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> > addr, value, mask, read, ok ? "OK" : "FAIL");
> > }
> >
> > + gen6_gt_force_wake_put(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> > intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
> > mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> >
> > --
> > 2.1.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-22 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-21 16:58 [PATCH] drm/i915: add missing forcewake put on i915_wa_registers() Paulo Zanoni
2014-10-21 17:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-10-22 7:35 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2014-10-22 8:56 ` Siluvery, Arun
2014-10-23 11:21 ` Paulo Zanoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141022073522.GR4284@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.