From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/12] IB/srp: Use block layer tags Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 01:47:44 -0700 Message-ID: <20141023084744.GA24965@infradead.org> References: <5433E43D.3010107@acm.org> <5433E557.3010505@acm.org> <94D0CD8314A33A4D9D801C0FE68B4029593212E0@G4W3296.americas.hpqcorp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <94D0CD8314A33A4D9D801C0FE68B4029593212E0@G4W3296.americas.hpqcorp.net> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" Cc: Bart Van Assche , Jens Axboe , Sagi Grimberg , Sebastian Parschauer , Ming Lei , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , linux-rdma , "Scales, Webb" , "Don Brace (PMC)" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:03:24PM +0000, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote: > Have you tested this with scsi_mod.use_blk_mq=n? > > Trying similar changes in hpsa, we still receive some INQUIRY commands > submitted through queuecommand with tag -1. They are for devices for > which slave_alloc has not yet been run, implying this work needs to > be done even earlier. Maybe the midlayer is missing a slave_alloc > call somewhere? Did that version of hpsa really enable tagging in slave_alloc or just in slave_configure? The latter would cause INQUIRY to be sent untagged.