From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] mfd: tps65910: Convert ti,system-power-controller DT property to poweroff-source Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 11:02:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20141023100221.GA10395@x1> References: <1413991587-11110-1-git-send-email-romain.perier@gmail.com> <20141022155058.GN4939@x1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: PERIER Romain Cc: "sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org" , robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, "pawel.moll" , mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, ijc+devicetree , galak , Russell King - ARM Linux , swarren , "thierry.reding" , gnurou , Grant Likely , Linux Kernel Mailing List , devicetree , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Mark Brown List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, PERIER Romain wrote: > 2014-10-22 17:50 GMT+02:00 Lee Jones : > > On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, PERIER Romain wrote: > > > >> This is related to the following subject "[RFC v3 PATCH 1/5] of: A= dd > >> standard property for poweroff capability" and depends on the > >> corresponding patch. > > > > Then it should be sent in the same patch-set. > > > > There's nothing I can do with this patch as is. > > >=20 > Even if this patch is already commited and present in "linux-next" ? > (or in Mark Brown's regulator tree) Usually it wouldn't be possible to take this, as it would be difficult to ensure bisectability. The way we usually deal with this is to have a shared immutable branch between the effected subsystems, but we can only do this if the patches are sent as a set. However, it appears as though Mark has "of: Add standard property for poweroff capability" on a tagged branch on its own. This means, after checking with Mark that this branch in indeed stable, I can merge it in and base this commit on top of it. Not many people setup their repos like Mark does, so I guess you are lucky this time. Once I've heard back from Mark, I'll let you know when I apply the patch. --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 11:02:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v1 1/5] mfd: tps65910: Convert ti, system-power-controller DT property to poweroff-source In-Reply-To: References: <1413991587-11110-1-git-send-email-romain.perier@gmail.com> <20141022155058.GN4939@x1> Message-ID: <20141023100221.GA10395@x1> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, PERIER Romain wrote: > 2014-10-22 17:50 GMT+02:00 Lee Jones : > > On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, PERIER Romain wrote: > > > >> This is related to the following subject "[RFC v3 PATCH 1/5] of: Add > >> standard property for poweroff capability" and depends on the > >> corresponding patch. > > > > Then it should be sent in the same patch-set. > > > > There's nothing I can do with this patch as is. > > > > Even if this patch is already commited and present in "linux-next" ? > (or in Mark Brown's regulator tree) Usually it wouldn't be possible to take this, as it would be difficult to ensure bisectability. The way we usually deal with this is to have a shared immutable branch between the effected subsystems, but we can only do this if the patches are sent as a set. However, it appears as though Mark has "of: Add standard property for poweroff capability" on a tagged branch on its own. This means, after checking with Mark that this branch in indeed stable, I can merge it in and base this commit on top of it. Not many people setup their repos like Mark does, so I guess you are lucky this time. Once I've heard back from Mark, I'll let you know when I apply the patch. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753962AbaJWKCn (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2014 06:02:43 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.216.49]:39712 "EHLO mail-qa0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752079AbaJWKCj (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2014 06:02:39 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 11:02:21 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: PERIER Romain Cc: "sameo@linux.intel.com" , robh+dt@kernel.org, "pawel.moll" , mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree , galak , Russell King - ARM Linux , swarren , "thierry.reding" , gnurou , Grant Likely , Linux Kernel Mailing List , devicetree , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] mfd: tps65910: Convert ti,system-power-controller DT property to poweroff-source Message-ID: <20141023100221.GA10395@x1> References: <1413991587-11110-1-git-send-email-romain.perier@gmail.com> <20141022155058.GN4939@x1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, PERIER Romain wrote: > 2014-10-22 17:50 GMT+02:00 Lee Jones : > > On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, PERIER Romain wrote: > > > >> This is related to the following subject "[RFC v3 PATCH 1/5] of: Add > >> standard property for poweroff capability" and depends on the > >> corresponding patch. > > > > Then it should be sent in the same patch-set. > > > > There's nothing I can do with this patch as is. > > > > Even if this patch is already commited and present in "linux-next" ? > (or in Mark Brown's regulator tree) Usually it wouldn't be possible to take this, as it would be difficult to ensure bisectability. The way we usually deal with this is to have a shared immutable branch between the effected subsystems, but we can only do this if the patches are sent as a set. However, it appears as though Mark has "of: Add standard property for poweroff capability" on a tagged branch on its own. This means, after checking with Mark that this branch in indeed stable, I can merge it in and base this commit on top of it. Not many people setup their repos like Mark does, so I guess you are lucky this time. Once I've heard back from Mark, I'll let you know when I apply the patch. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog