From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [OPW PATCH V4] tools: xl: refactor code to parse
 network device options
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:17:25 -0400
Message-ID: <20141024171725.GC12318@laptop.dumpdata.com>
References: <1413927381-21549-1-git-send-email-alecsandra.sandulescu@gmail.com>
	<1413977758.19198.12.camel@citrix.com>
	<20141022202146.GB6020@laptop.dumpdata.com>
	<1414050974.20604.79.camel@citrix.com>
	<3C254340-3D3F-4744-81FA-D9E65450D9A4@oracle.com>
	<1414099258.20604.84.camel@citrix.com>
	<CAPbh3ruo9H+tRxu08RkBMgEWGb5zZxv05y6oKcW5QtY-_Xm5eQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1414137663.3584.5.camel@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>) id 1XhiW6-0000t0-Cw
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 17:19:10 +0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1414137663.3584.5.camel@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: konrad@darnok.org, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Alexandra Sandulescu <alecsandra.sandulescu@gmail.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:01:03AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 19:08 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > He said the code *path*, not the code, IOW I would read that as "would
> > > be tested", NOT "has been tested".
> > >
> > 
> > Aye. In which case let's wait for Alexandra's response to the testing
> > that Wei asked for.
> 
> Alexandra replied to me (privately) a couple of days ago confirming that
> she has tested both code paths.
> 
> > On a related note - one can setup OSSTest on ones own network, fairly easy right?
> 
> Right in "standalone mode". It's far easier than it once was and we've
> been squashing speedbumps as new people try it.
> 
> You do need some infrastructure such as PXE and dhcp and at least two
> machines (controller + test host). I think it would be overkill for a
> change of this magnitude (if that's what you were driving at).

Heck no. I just need to setup locally to supplement the automated testing
I do now.

> 
> I think
> http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README;h=9a85549cb600fa5be91bcbae6605f78616db63da;hb=2aa4fe7a4b138e5e88387af66f4fe14039a1f7ea is the best starting point for osstest, including standalone mode operation.
> 

Thank you.
> Ian.
>