From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: manish jaggi <manishjaggi.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
manish.jaggi@caviumnetworks.com,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com
Subject: Re: Xen regressions for ARM SMMU (non pci-passthrough)
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:38:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141028143844.GA22976@laptop.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAiw7Jm2oEzh9iVtvk+m4UKAUDtP6Ts6X_9wQyQe7k0ZXktwWA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 07:53:07PM +0530, manish jaggi wrote:
> On 28 October 2014 19:27, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 02:49:16PM +0530, manish jaggi wrote:
> >> On 27 October 2014 18:56, Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> wrote:
> >> > Hello Manish,
> >> >
> >> > On 10/27/2014 09:54 AM, manish jaggi wrote:
> >> >> On 27 October 2014 14:57, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> >> >>> On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 13:56 +0530, manish jaggi wrote:
> >> >>>> I am trying to find out about the tests which are part of the Xen
> >> >>>> regression suite for Arm which tests the SMMU and non pic-passthrough
> >> >>>> feature.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> There are currently no such tests in the osstest suite.
> >> >
> >> > Device passthrough is not supported in Xen upstream. So adding test for
> >> > it is not yet relevant.
> >> >
> >> Is it not targeted for Xen 4.5 ? I believed it was part of 4.5 release
> >
> > MMIO has been added in Xen 4.5. PCI passthrough = no.
> In my mail I refer to non-pci device passthrough and not pci
> passthrough. PCI passthrough is targeted in 4.6.
> As per the Xen 4.5 development update mail IMHO non-pci passthrough
> (dt node passthrough) is going in 4.5
>
> * Linux ARM - Device assigment (fair)
Well, that is the Linux side, not the Xen side.
> - Julien Grall
>
> My PCI passthrough work is based on juliens non-pci passthrough xen
> unstable tree, which I assume to be merged in 4.5 and I would rebase
Which tree is that?
> on the 4.5 release.
We are in Xen 4.5 RC1 so the bar for new features is high.
>
>
> >>
> >> > For SMMU, there is no need to have specific test. Any platform with SMMU
> >> > describe in the device tree will use the SMMU drivers in Xen.
> >> >
> >> > We have only one platform with SMMU platform in OSS-test which is
> >> > midway. But the device tree provided upstream doesn't have the SMMU nodes.
> >> >
> >> >>>
> >> >> Is Julien Planning to add the tests ?
> >> >
> >> > I don't plan to add any test or make midway uses SMMU for testing. You
> >> > are welcome to send a patch for it.
> >> Is it not tested on Foundation Model ?
> >
> > I am confused. Do you have an foundation model? Are you seeing issues
> > with it? Did you report the bug to xen-devel?
> >
> > Or are you merely asking whether said hardware has been tested?
> > Do you have that hardware?
> I was enquiring that is there any other platform the Xen 4.5 non
> pci-device passthrough works other than midway.
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Julien Grall
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Xen-devel mailing list
> >> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> >> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-28 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-27 8:26 Xen regressions for ARM SMMU (non pci-passthrough) manish jaggi
2014-10-27 9:27 ` Ian Campbell
2014-10-27 9:54 ` manish jaggi
2014-10-27 13:26 ` Julien Grall
2014-10-28 9:19 ` manish jaggi
2014-10-28 13:57 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-10-28 14:23 ` manish jaggi
2014-10-28 14:38 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141028143844.GA22976@laptop.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=manish.jaggi@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=manishjaggi.oss@gmail.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.