All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>, Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] x86, ptdump: Add section for EFI runtime services
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 19:57:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141028185756.GD10873@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141012125515.GA32045@jig.fritz.box>

On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 02:55:15PM +0200, Mathias Krause wrote:

...

> There's a lengthy comment in arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c that mentions
> the duplication of pgd entries -- and therefore whole hierarchies --
> between trampoline_pgd and init_level4_pgt. And, ironically, that
> comment is yours from earlier this year. Looks like you forgot about
> that in the meantime ;)

Absolutely - you can see how crazy I am about UEFI :-)

Ok, thanks for refreshing this for me, your patch is good, so

Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>

What this whole story shows, however, is that the EFI mappings are in
fact in the kernel page table and this shouldn't be IMO - I'd like to
very much have them split because otherwise there's no need to switch
page tables at all. And besides, having UEFI in its own address space is
a good thing in itself anyway.

So, I've already hacked up something to have a completely separate EFI
page table - need to find out why it doesn't work yet but qemu was
b0rked until recently so we had to deal with that first... bla bla.

Thanks :-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-28 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-21 15:26 [PATCHv2 0/3] x86, ptdump: a EFI related fix + enhancements Mathias Krause
2014-09-21 15:26 ` [PATCHv2 1/3] x86, ptdump: Add section for EFI runtime services Mathias Krause
2014-10-03 13:47   ` Matt Fleming
2014-10-07 15:01     ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-07 17:07       ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-08 15:17         ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-08 21:58           ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-08 22:26             ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-12 12:55               ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-28 18:57                 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2014-10-28 19:48                   ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-28 20:13                     ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-28 21:14                       ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-28 21:26                         ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-28 21:49                           ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-28 22:07                             ` Borislav Petkov
2014-10-29  8:06                               ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-29 14:20                         ` Matt Fleming
2014-10-29 15:19                           ` Mathias Krause
2014-10-29 14:22                     ` Matt Fleming
2014-10-29 15:22                       ` Mathias Krause
2014-11-11 21:59                       ` Mathias Krause
2014-11-11 22:32                         ` Matt Fleming
2014-09-21 15:26 ` [PATCHv2 2/3] x86, ptdump: Simplify page flag evaluation code Mathias Krause
2014-09-21 19:49   ` Arjan van de Ven
2014-09-21 20:33     ` Mathias Krause
2014-09-24  7:45       ` Ingo Molnar
2014-09-25 19:27         ` Mathias Krause
2014-09-26  9:25           ` Ingo Molnar
2014-09-26 10:11             ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-26 11:15               ` Ingo Molnar
2014-09-26 12:35             ` Mathias Krause
2014-09-21 15:26 ` [PATCHv2 3/3] x86, ptdump: Take parent page flags into account Mathias Krause

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141028185756.GD10873@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=minipli@googlemail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.