From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com ([209.85.217.172]:61239 "EHLO mail-lb0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752283AbaJ2HXi (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2014 03:23:38 -0400 Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id n15so1973905lbi.3 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:23:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:23:34 +0100 From: Alexander Aring Subject: Re: [PATCH bluetooth-next 07/17] mac802154: remove might_sleep from driver layer Message-ID: <20141029072333.GF4709@omega> References: <1414516892-4107-1-git-send-email-alex.aring@gmail.com> <1414516892-4107-8-git-send-email-alex.aring@gmail.com> <5450601D.8040608@gmail.com> <20141029055303.GC4709@omega> <545081E1.8000508@gmail.com> <20141029061306.GE4709@omega> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141029061306.GE4709@omega> Sender: linux-wpan-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Varka Bhadram Cc: linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de Hi Varka, it's too early in the morning, apologize my english here. On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 07:13:06AM +0100, Alexander Aring wrote: > Hi Varka, > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:27:53AM +0530, Varka Bhadram wrote: > > On 10/29/2014 11:23 AM, Alexander Aring wrote: > > >Hi Varka, > > > > > >On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 09:03:49AM +0530, Varka Bhadram wrote: > > >>On 10/28/2014 10:51 PM, Alexander Aring wrote: > > >>>This patch removes all might_sleep calls from driver layer. This > > >>>handling is already done by mac802154 layer. > > >>> > > >>>Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring > > >>>--- > > >>> drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c | 3 --- > > >>> drivers/net/ieee802154/cc2520.c | 1 - > > >>> drivers/net/ieee802154/fakelb.c | 4 ---- > > >>> 3 files changed, 8 deletions(-) > > >>> > > >>For CC2520 driver > > >> > > >I would Cc you here if you stand in the MAINTAINERS file for cc2520 > > >driver. I asked you some months ago if you like to be there. I didn't > > >saw any patches for that. I thought it's out of interest by you that you > > >want to be maintainer for this driver. When these changes are very trivial > > >like this one, it's okay for you when Marcel simple apply these patches > > >without any ack? I already told him that we don't need to wait of Alan's > > >ack for the mrf24j40 driver. > > > > > >Nevertheless if you want to add really a Acked here and we need to wait > > >then please insert you in the MAINTAINERS file. When I run > > >get_maintainers it's currently me who is maintainer for the cc2520 driver. > > > > > >If you want to take care of this driver, please see my improvements and > > >fixes for the at86rf230. I am sure you could also take some code for the > > >cc2520 from it. Also I would be very happy for async xmit handling or > > >regmap support. Most of the cc2520 code is lowlevel spi api calls. > > > > > >- Alex > > > > I think i clarified you that i want to be the CC2520 driver maintainer. > > > > I asked you to submit the patche for MAINTAINER file, you told that its > > not required. > > > > I looked up the conversion: > s/conversion/conversation/ > You: > > "You mean to say that i need to add an entry in MAINTAINER file or ..?" > > Me: > > "not need, only if you like. I have no idea about the cc2520 driver." > > need != required. For me this sentence is more... you really don't need > that do be maintainer of this if you don't like that. But if you like to s/do/to well, I think I cherry-pick some commits now to generate the next series. - Alex