From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Junien Fridrick <linux.kernel@junien.fridrick.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org, Peng Tao <bergwolf@gmail.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
Doug Oucharek <doug.s.oucharek@intel.com>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>,
Isaac Huang <he.huang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix sparse warning for static declarations
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 16:36:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141029083610.GA9261@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414264176-2546-1-git-send-email-linux.kernel@junien.fridrick.net>
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 07:09:34PM +0000, Junien Fridrick wrote:
> This patch fixes the following sparse warnings :
>
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c:167:5: warning: symbol 'proc_lnet_routes' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c:293:5: warning: symbol 'proc_lnet_routers' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c:428:5: warning: symbol 'proc_lnet_peers' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c:660:5: warning: symbol 'proc_lnet_nis' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Junien Fridrick <linux.kernel@junien.fridrick.net>
> ---
> This patch is part of task 16 of the Eudyptula challenge
> Applies to next-20141023
>
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
This patch fails to apply to my tree, please refresh and try again.
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-29 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-25 19:09 [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix sparse warning for static declarations Junien Fridrick
2014-10-29 8:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141029083610.GA9261@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org \
--cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=bergwolf@gmail.com \
--cc=clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=doug.s.oucharek@intel.com \
--cc=he.huang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux.kernel@junien.fridrick.net \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.