From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933168AbaJ2M6b (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:58:31 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.19.201]:37207 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932806AbaJ2M63 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:58:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:58:24 -0200 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Hunter , Alexander Yarygin , Andi Kleen , Anton Blanchard , Arun Sharma , Borislav Petkov , Corey Ashford , David Ahern , Don Zickus , Frederic Weisbecker , Hemant Kumar , Jean Pihet , Jiri Olsa , Li Zefan , Masami Hiramatsu , Mike Galbraith , Namhyung Kim , Paul Mackerras , Peter Zijlstra , Srikar Dronamraju , Stephane Eranian , Sukadev Bhattiprolu , Waiman Long , Wang Nan Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 00/32] perf/core improvements and fixes Message-ID: <20141029125824.GC19829@kernel.org> References: <1414503146-22789-1-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org> <20141029091148.GA9000@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141029091148.GA9000@gmail.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:11:48AM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu: > * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > * 'perf probe' --demangle typo fix and a new --quiet option (Masami Hiramatsu) > So the fix part would be nice to have for perf/urgent I suspect? > > * Fix report -F (abort, in_tx, mispredict, etc) segfaults for sample.data files > > without branch info (Jiri Olsa) > Ditto. > > * Don't open the DWARF info multiple times, keeping instead a dwfl handle > > in struct dso, greatly speeding up 'perf report' on powerpc. (Sukadev Bhattiprolu) > > * Add patch that should have went in a previous patchkit to use global cache > > provided by libunwind (Namhyung Kim) > Given that this is already upstream, is this a required fix for > perf/urgent or can it wait and go into perf/core? > And then the remaining bits should be based on the urgent tree. Ok, did the split, I thought that those were lower prio for corner cases and it all going via the next release, but sure, if you think it can go this time, lets do it :-) - Arnaldo