From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: I2C OF IRQ parsing issue due to probe ordering
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:56:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141030125645.GA19386@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141027125819.GA12641@katana>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1519 bytes --]
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 01:58:19PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > The i2c@e6520000 node is probed before the gpio@e6051000 node. The
> > of_i2c_register_devices() function tries to register all children, including
> > hdmi@39. It tries to parse and map the I2C client IRQ by calling
> > irq_of_parse_and_map(), which returns 0 as the interrupt controller isn't
> > probed yet. The adv7511 driver later probes the hdmi@39 device and gets
> > client->irq set to 0.
>
> I've got this strange feeling of deja vu... Ah, here: Thierry Reding
> tackled this problem a year ago. His series:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/16/111 (of/irq: Defer interrupt reference
> resolution)
>
> He did a V2 (which never made it to the i2c list). Seems like the first
> two patches made it and the rest got stalled without discussion?
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/18/216
>
> Adding Thierry to the queue. Maybe he can bring some light to what
> happened to his series.
I tried to fix it in a proper way, but it seems people were uneasy with
how invasive the change was. At some point I lost interest. People ended
up merging something that was similar, but side-stepped the issue of
propagating error codes all the way up by introducing a new API and in
case of of_irq_parse_one() failing doing an additional check to see if
the reason was the missing IRQ domain.
See:
9ec36cafe43b of/irq: do irq resolution in platform_get_irq
I suspect a similar thing could be done for I2C.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-30 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-25 22:13 I2C OF IRQ parsing issue due to probe ordering Laurent Pinchart
2014-10-27 12:58 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-27 12:58 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-30 12:53 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-10-30 13:02 ` Thierry Reding
2014-10-30 13:12 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-10-30 12:56 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2014-10-30 13:05 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-10-30 13:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-30 13:22 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-10-30 13:43 ` Thierry Reding
2014-10-30 11:58 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-10-30 11:58 ` Ezequiel Garcia
[not found] ` <545227E4.5070507-30ULvvUtt6G51wMPkGsGjgyUoB5FGQPZ@public.gmane.org>
2014-10-30 12:15 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-10-30 12:15 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141030125645.GA19386@ulmo \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.