From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlGoU-0005ZX-MN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 07:32:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlGoO-0004Sn-EP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 07:32:50 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4823) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlGoO-0004Sg-7n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 07:32:44 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 10:32:36 -0200 From: Eduardo Habkost Message-ID: <20141103123236.GG3298@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> References: <1413446034-25167-1-git-send-email-dgilbert@redhat.com> <1413446034-25167-2-git-send-email-dgilbert@redhat.com> <20141030122652.GA19349@grmbl.mre> <20141103085353.GA3480@work-vm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141103085353.GA3480@work-vm> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Start moving migration code into a migration directory List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Cc: Gary Hook , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "quintela@redhat.com" On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 08:53:54AM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: [...] > > But tidy organization is a good thing while needless renaming is not. The > > only goal that the suggested renames would appear to accomplish is > > additional obfuscation. How about just moving them into a subdirectory and > > leave their names alone? > > Which is what I did; however I have sympathy with those that think that in a > directory called 'migration' starting a bunch of the files with 'migration-' is > excessive. I, for one, don't even see the difference between moving and renaming. :) -- Eduardo