All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
To: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-xen-4.5] tools/mkrpm: improve version.release handling
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 11:46:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141104104649.GA8479@aepfle.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFLBxZbCorLriYgAfzvCXENeA3dKsyc164WdcGbssgRX40RoEw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Nov 04, George Dunlap wrote:

> A number based on the time you happened to create the RPM, not based
> on something intrinsic about the content of the RPM; that just seems
> kind of hacky to me.  It happens to work well for your common
> workflow, but you can certainly imagine other workflows or other
> situations where you'd have to more manually override things anyway
> (for instance, doing bisections, or comparing functionality in
> different releases).  It seems like rather than having to remember
> when you can skip the manual override bits, and when you can't, it
> would be better to just use them all the time.

George, the release number is and was never meant to describe the
content of a package. It just means "its different". And it will even
work for bisect because the package is always "newer", even if the
content is different.

And after commit b8ebc6b9e07d3cc061fdded1a0530bd6b25d4634 ("tools/mkrpm:
allow custom rpm package name") and all the --prefix changes its easy to
have independent packages for every branch.

Olaf

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-04 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-07 15:01 [PATCH for-xen-4.5] tools/mkrpm: improve version.release handling Olaf Hering
2014-10-07 15:03 ` Olaf Hering
2014-10-29  8:17 ` Olaf Hering
2014-11-03 11:00   ` George Dunlap
2014-11-03 14:16 ` George Dunlap
2014-11-03 14:19   ` George Dunlap
2014-11-03 14:24   ` Olaf Hering
2014-11-03 14:29     ` Ian Campbell
2014-11-03 14:47       ` Olaf Hering
2014-11-04 10:11         ` Ian Campbell
2014-11-04 10:16           ` Olaf Hering
2014-11-03 14:32     ` George Dunlap
2014-11-03 14:48       ` Olaf Hering
2014-11-04 10:37         ` George Dunlap
2014-11-04 10:46           ` Olaf Hering [this message]
2014-11-04 11:00             ` George Dunlap
2014-11-04 11:03               ` Ian Campbell
2014-11-07 13:30                 ` Olaf Hering
2014-11-07 14:52                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141104104649.GA8479@aepfle.de \
    --to=olaf@aepfle.de \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.