From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33450) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlkG9-0005Pg-L0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 14:59:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlkFy-0007Js-Ro for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 14:59:21 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55070) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlkFy-0007Jl-KS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 14:59:10 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 18:58:53 +0000 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Message-ID: <20141104185852.GE14394@work-vm> References: <1412358473-31398-1-git-send-email-dgilbert@redhat.com> <1412358473-31398-15-git-send-email-dgilbert@redhat.com> <5430378A.5030604@redhat.com> <20141023162331.GA21829@work-vm> <544961D8.5040203@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <544961D8.5040203@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 14/47] Return path: Control commands List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: aarcange@redhat.com, yamahata@private.email.ne.jp, quintela@redhat.com, cristian.klein@cs.umu.se, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, amit.shah@redhat.com, yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com * Paolo Bonzini (pbonzini@redhat.com) wrote: > > the only oddity I get from that is from the 'SEND_ACK' you suggested; > > since all my functions to send commands are send_ I currently have > > 'qemu_savevm_send_send_ack' which while consistent looks a bit odd. > > Perhaps ping/pong? Done (although I'm sure I'll find 'ack' in the comments somewhere). Dave -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK