From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:01:17 +0100 Message-ID: <20141110160117.GA15315@lst.de> References: <20141110171533.63b2dfcc@canb.auug.org.au> <525DB349B3FB5444AE057A887CB2A8D8D71B12@nice.asicdesigners.com> <20141110134607.GA3621@lst.de> <1415632890.22736.1.camel@jarvis.lan> <20141110154802.GA11895@lst.de> <1415634616.22736.9.camel@jarvis.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:36194 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752910AbaKJQBV (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:01:21 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1415634616.22736.9.camel@jarvis.lan> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: James Bottomley Cc: Anish Bhatt , Stephen Rothwell , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Karen Xie On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 07:50:16AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > So your idea is Fenguang first then linux-next. Exactly.